Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02007772

Effectiveness of TNI vs. BiPAP in Chronic Global Insufficiency in COPD Patients

The purpose of this trial ist to investigate the difference of the efficacy of two systems for breath support in patients with COPD.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Klinik Donaustauf, Zentrum für Pneumologie, Donaustauf, Bavaria, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The trial consists of 12 weeks of therapy that is divided into two sections. In the first 6-week section patients receive treatment with either TNI or BiPAP and in the second 6-week section treatment is changed. The starting therapy is allocated to the patients via randomisation and should be started directly after the baseline visit.

The treatment and the follow-up period end with the second visit after the second treatment section and the patient decides which device he/she wants to use further.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • presence of COPD with chronic respiratory global insufficiency
  • chronic day-hypercapnia with pCO2 >= 50 mmHg and typical symptoms of ventilatory insufficiency OR patients with exacerbation (after abate of acute symptomatology) with documented hypercapnia >= 50 mmHG on preliminary findings
  • age 18 or older
  • the patient or caretaker must be able to operate the device after a specific training
  • patient must be willing to use the nHF-/BiPAP-device for the whole trial period for at least 5 hours/day
  • patient must be able to answer the questionnaires
  • written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • presence of acute respiratory insufficiency
  • exacerbation of type I or II in the last 4 weeks
  • conservative therapy including long-term oxygen therapy according to GOLD update 2011 is not exhausted
  • previous treatment with NIV (non-invasive ventilation) in the last 14 days
  • clinical instability or acute illness (e.g. acute myocardial infarction, tachycardial atrial fibrillation)
  • signs of cardial decompensation (e.g. edema in the lower limbs, pleural effusion)
  • other serious concomitant diseases, the assessment of eligibility is at the discretion of the investigator
  • contraindications for NIV
  • anamnestic suspicion or proven obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)
  • relevant systemic infections, assessment of eligibility is at the discretion of the investigator
  • BMI > 30
  • other additional pulmonary diseases of other genesis or diseases that affect breathing (e.g. mucoviscidosis, scoliosis, muscular diseases)
  • lack of compliance
  • participation in other interventional trials at the same time
  • pregnant or nursing women
  • fertile female patients without effective contraceptive measures during trial participation

Treatment and study plan

nHF

Device

nasal high-flow is used over a period of 6 weeks (outpatient)

Other names: nasal high-flow

BiPAP

Device

BiPAP is used over a period of 6 weeks (outpatient)

Primary outcomes

  1. difference in capillary CO2 carbon dioxide

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    The primary endpoint is the difference of the capillary pC02 between the treatment with nasal high-flow compared with the baseline value.

Secondary outcomes

  1. difference in absolute change of capillary pCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide ) compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  2. frequency of occurrence of normocapnia after intervention

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    Normocapnia is therefore defined as capillary pCO2 <= 45 mmHg

  3. difference of the relative and absolute change of capillary pCO2 compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  4. difference of the absolute change of SaO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  5. difference of the absolute and relative change of base excess compared with baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  6. difference of the values of base excess after treatment with nHF (nasal high-flow) and of base excess after treatment with BiPAP

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  7. difference of the absolute change of HCO3- (hydrogen carbonate / bicarbonate) compared with baseline

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  8. difference of HCO3- after treatment with nHF and of HC03- after treatment with BiPAP

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  9. difference of P0,1 after treatment with nHF and of P0,1 after treatment with BiPAP

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  10. difference of PImax after treatment with nHF and of PImax (maximal inspiratory pressure) after treatment with BiPAP

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  11. difference of P0,1/PImax after treatment with nHF and of P0,1/PImax after treatment with BiPAP

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  12. difference of the absolute change of the results of the 6-minutes walking test compared with baseline

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  13. difference of the absolute change of the disease-specific quality of life compared to baseline

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

    Quality of life is measured by SGQR (The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire), SRI (Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire), a VAS referring to the general health status and the Borg-Scale (CR 10)

  14. frequency of occurrence and type of adverse events under trial therapy (both arms)

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  15. difference of the values of user-friendliness of both devices

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  16. difference of the time both devices were used

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Leipzig

Other

Collaborators

  • TNI Medical AG

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of TNI (Nasal High-flow) vs. BiPAP (Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure) in Chronic Global Insufficiency in COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Patients

Acronym: TIBICO

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 11, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 15, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.