Jessa Hospital
Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT03102671
The recurrence of major cardiac events after infarction is very high, in some populations up to 20% in the first year. Optimal secondary prevention as organized in cardiac rehabilitation centers is effective in reducing both morbidity and mortality. However, many studies have shown that the participation and adherence rate in CR-programs is low in most European countries. Therefore, novel ways of delivering secondary prevention using information technology and self-monitoring are being explored. Hence, this study will investigate the effectiveness of a mobile, patient tailored, app based multidisciplinary telerehabilitation program (HeartHab app) in improving exercise capacity, lifestyle and risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease in a post-rehabilitation setting.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
Study design and population This study is a prospective double-arm, non-pragmatic, cross-over, randomized controlled trial. Approximately 30 subjects will be selected retrospectively from the cardiology database of the Jessa Hospital Hasselt. Subjects who do not violate any of the predefined exclusion criteria and have provided informed consent will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment strategies (AB sequence or BA sequence).
After two months, each individual will be switched to the other treatment strategy.
Measurements At baseline, after two months (+14 days) and after four months (+14 days), a clinical assessment, medical history, current medication therapy, fasting blood sample, maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, pulmonary function and three completed questionnaires (HeartQol, IPAQ and EQ-5D) will be collected of all patients. A fourth questionnaire will be completed by all the patients, focusing on the usability of the HeartHab-application.
Statistical analysis Data analysis will be performed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the intention-to-treat principle by assigned treatment group. Nonparametric alternatives will be used for parametric statistics in case assumptions for the latter are violated. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to assess normality. Paired t tests (parametric) or Wilcoxon signed rank tests (nonparametric) will be used for within-group analysis; independent t tests (parametric) or Mann-Whitney U tests (nonparametric) for between-group analysis. Chi-square tests will be used in case of categorical variables; Fisher's exact tests will be used when expected frequencies are small. The significance level for tests is 2-sided α=.05.
The cost-effectiveness evaluation will be conducted from a society and patient perspective, taking into account both intervention and health care resource costs. As the majority of patients will be retired, productivity losses due to illness-related absence from the workplace will not be taken into account.
Health care costs will be the aggregated costs of hospital admissions for cardiovascular reasons and also specialist visits and associated diagnostics. The cardiovascular rehospitalizations' related costs will be derived from invoices retrieved from the recruiting hospitals' financial departments. INAMI/RIZIV's nomenclature-based tariffs will define specialist visits and diagnostics denominations.
Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) will be used as a generic measure of effectiveness. Estimates of QALYs will be derived from the EQ-5D questionnaire. The EQ-5D scores will be converted to utility scores. The utility estimates will be converted to adjusted mean QALYs by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) utility estimates for all time intervals for each patient, weighted by the length of follow-up at that time interval. The change from baseline utility (adjusted differential incremental QALYs) will then be calculated, using the multiple regression model to control for baseline utility differences.
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will be calculated (ICER¼(Cost intervention group - Cost control group)/(Effectiveness intervention group - Effectiveness control group)) to compare costs and outcomes (effectiveness) across both treatment groups. The incremental cost will be determined by the difference in total average cost per patient between the intervention group and control group. The incremental effectiveness will be estimated by the adjusted differential incremental QALYs.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
use of a mobile, app based multidisciplinary telerehabilitation program (2 months) followed by usual care (two months)
Usual care (2 months) followed by the use of HeartHab application (two months)
Time frame: day1
Exercise capacity is defined as the peak oxygen uptake, measured by CPET (cardiopulmonary exercise test)
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Exercise capacity is defined as the peak oxygen uptake, measured by CPET (cardiopulmonary exercise test)
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Exercise capacity is defined as the peak oxygen uptake, measured by CPET (cardiopulmonary exercise test)
Time frame: day 1
Blood pressure
Time frame: day 1
Diabetes
Time frame: day 1
Overweight
Time frame: day 1
Smoking
Time frame: day 1
Physical activity
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Blood pressure
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Diabetes
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Overweight
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Smoking
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Physical activity
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Blood pressure
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Diabetes
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Overweight
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Smoking
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Physical activity
Time frame: day 1
EQ5D
Time frame: day 1
IPAQ
Time frame: day 1
Heart QoL
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
EQ5D
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
IPAQ
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Heart QoL
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
EQ5D
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
IPAQ
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Heart QoL
Time frame: day 1
Collection of adverse events during follow up visit
Time frame: month 2 + 14 days
Collection of adverse events during follow up visit
Time frame: month 4 + 14 days
Collection of adverse events during follow up visit
Hasselt University
Other
HeartHab: a Prospective Cross-over Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of an App Based Telerehabilitation Program on Exercise Capacity, Lifestyle and Risk Factors in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03188705
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07468955
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kütahya, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04058990
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial Details