Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07280988

Effectiveness of Slip Resistant Footwear in Dairy Industry

In the dairy industry, same-level falls are a major problem and a well-known challenge. At Arla's dairy in Taulov, where this RCT study is being carried out, reports of risk observations, near incidents, and workplace accidents have increased over the past five years. Accident statistics further show that same-level falls are the most common incidents, with slippery floors and surfaces being by far the main cause of both near incidents and risk observations. Because of this, it is necessary to test different types of safety footwear that, based on laboratory studies, are considered particularly suitable for the working environment in a dairy.

it is hypothesized that employees, through subjective questionnaires, will rate one shoe as less slippery than the other. At the same time, it is hypothesized that employees will also subjectively find one shoe more comfortable than the other.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Arla Foods AMBA

Taulov, 7000, Denmark

About this study

Slipping, tripping, and falling (STF) are the second most common risk factor for serious occupational accidents in Denmark, accounting for 18.9% of the cases. In fact, general fall accidents in 2016 were estimated to cause annual additional costs of 3.9 billion DKK due to lost productivity, and a further 4.8 billion DKK in healthcare and long-term care expenses. Similar numbers are observed in the United States, where STF is likewise reported as the second most common cause of workplace accidents. The primary cause of STF incidents is often insufficient friction between footwear and walking surfaces. In response to this issue, ASTM International in 2021 raised the minimum threshold for certified slip-resistant footwear, making it even more challenging for manufacturers to meet test requirements. Although recent years have brought advances in the understanding of mechanisms leading to STF events-particularly slipping-there is still insufficient research translating this knowledge into practical preventive measures. Data from the Danish Working Environment Authority confirm this gap, showing that reported STF accidents increased between 2016 and 2021. Moreover, the actual number of near incidents is likely even higher, as many are never formally registered. Implementing existing prevention knowledge into effective, practical interventions remains a key challenge. Analysis of gait patterns has been suggested as a way to better understand changes in walking stability, thereby enabling quantification of near-incidents occurrences.

This RCT study will, for the first time, combine multiple measurement parameters, including reported falls, near incidents, risk situations, perceived slip resistance, and gait characteristics (e.g., step length, cadence). These outcomes will be measured through both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative gait data will be collected using accelerometers, with two sensors allocated to each participants foot/shoe. This system has previously been used to quantify gait patterns. Qualitative data will be collected through self-reported records. By linking spatiotemporal gait parameters with self-reported accident and near-miss data, this study will provide new insights into the relationship between objective and subjective safety outcomes. In addition, it is crucial to identify potential barriers and challenges experienced both by employees using slip-resistant footwear and by procurement decision-makers responsible for footwear acquisition. To address this, focus group interviews and surveys will be conducted among study participants as well as procurement staff at Arla in Taulov.

A power calculation estimated the required sample size at 28 participants, based on an expected α of 0.05, β of 0.20, and an effect size of 0.25. Allowing for an anticipated dropout rate of 20%, the recruitment target is set at 34 participants (17 in each study arm). Considering the number of employees working in slippery zones, it was decided that only a cross-over design will enable to recruit a sufficient number of participants. Employees at Arla's Taulov dairy will be recruited and randomized (1:1) to either start working with one pair of safety shoes while the other half will start with the other pair of safety shoes using a computer-generated minimization sequence, ensuring balance between groups in terms of sex, age, and prior fall history.

Quantitative and qualitative data will be presented descriptively. Following a thematic analysis approach, outcomes such as comfort, gait patterns, perceived safety, fall/near-fall experiences, and economic considerations (e.g., purchase costs) will be displayed in a structured format that provides an overview of participants' experiences of the intervention as well as perceived barriers and benefits. To evaluate changes over time, quantitative outcomes will be analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Multiple imputation will be used to handle potential missing data, and differences between groups will be further assessed using post-hoc tests.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Full-time employed at Arla Taulov dairy facility.
  • No major injuries affecting their daily work.
  • No plans of retiring before the end of the study period.

Exclusion criteria

  • Surgery in the feet and under extremity within the last three months. Pregnancy.
  • Part-time workers.
  • Neurological disorders affecting gait.
  • Can read and understand Danish

Treatment and study plan

Environment specific safety footwear

Device

The participants will wear two different safety shoes (SIKA Highline and AIRTOX FW44) in the test periode (20 working days). 10 working days in each safety shoes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-reported feel of slipperines

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 working days

    Self-rated feel of slipperiness. "To what extent did you feel the need to walk carefully today?" Rated on a continuous VAS scale (not slippey to the right and slippery to the left). Less slippery towards right and most slippery towards left. Hence, towards right is better. These are obtained with daily questionaries.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spatiotemporal gait characteristics

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 working days

    Step length will be obtained using accelerometers positioned on the participants' shoes. This will be measured in meters.

  2. Slipping without falling

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 working days

    "Did you experience a slip today without falling?" These are obtained with daily questionaries. Yes/No

  3. Slipping and falling

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 working days

    "Did you experience a slip today resulting in a fall?" These are obtained with daily questionaries. Yes/No

Other outcomes

  1. Working hours

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 20 working days

    "How many hours did you work today?" These are obtained with daily questionaries.

  2. Division of work

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 working days.

    "In which division did you work today?" Choose between kit warehouse, packing, cheese factory or process. These are obtained with daily questionaries.

  3. Floor type

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 working days.

    "How much of your workday today did you spend on dry floors, wet floors and greasy floors?" Reported in hours. These are obtained with daily questionaries.

  4. Comfort

    Time frame: After 10 working days.

    "Overall, how comfortable have you found the shoes you have worn over the past 10 workdays?" Rated on a continuous visual analog scale (comfort to the right and discomfort to the left). These are obtained with questionaries after wearing one shoe for 10 working days.

  5. General slipperiness

    Time frame: After 20 working days.

    "Overall, how have you experienced the slip resistance of the shoes you have worn during the past 10 workdays?" These are obtained with questionaries after wearing one shoe for 10 working days. Rated on a continuous visual analog scale (not slippey to the right and slippery to the left).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aalborg University

Other

Collaborators

  • Arla Foods
  • Herning Hospital
  • Sika footwear
  • billigarbejdstøoj.dk

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Environment Specific Slip Resistant Footwear - A Randomized Cross-Over Study From Danish Dairy Industry

Acronym: SRFDI

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 15, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.