Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04859387

Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Technique VS Traditional Physical Therapy

Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Helping hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences Trust

Mansehra, KPK, 21300, Pakistan

About this study

Different physical therapy treatments are being used for shoulder pathologies which include modalities (hot pack, TENS), ROM exercises, stretching, strengthening, soft tissue mobilization and set of pragmatic manual techniques.The set of pragmatic manual therapies are novel techniques (comprises of acromioclavicular mobilization, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation, RC facilitation, and PCS) and its isolated effectiveness on ROM in healthy subjects has been investigated and found effective. These studies recommended the use of a pragmatic protocol for the prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder injuries and pathologies (unpublished data).As per our knowledge there is insufficient literature to support the comparison of the effectiveness of a set of pragmatic protocols with traditional interventions. Our research is proposed to compare the efficacy of pragmatic interventions with that of traditional interventions in patients with shoulder pathology and their effect on the quality of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Functional movement score 1 and 2 or limitation in Range of motion of Abduction, internal rotation, external rotation, RUBB, and RDBN. All or only one of the limitations in comparison with the unaffected shoulder joint.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with shoulder instability. Functional movement score 3 and 0. Individuals with recent fractures of fewer than 6 weeks duration. Cancerous Growth around the shoulder girdle. Breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RA arthritis patients. Long-term use of steroids and severe osteoporosis.

Treatment and study plan

set of pragmatic shoulder technique

Other

Group A received pragmatic intervention which includes Pectoralis major and minor stretch, AC joint mobilization, rotator cuff facilitation for subscapularis and infraspinatus, serratus anterior stretch, thoracic manipulation and posterior capsular stretch.

Traditional Physical therapy

Other

Group B received traditional interventions which includes modalities such as TENS and hot pack, soft tissue mobilization, joint mobilization, stretching and strengthening etc. other than pragmatic intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. shoulder Range of motion

    Time frame: 5 days

    will be measured in degrees by digital inclinometer

  2. functional movements

    Time frame: 5 days

    will be measured in centimeters by inchi tape

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Techniques in Comparison With Traditional Physical Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Pathologies

Acronym: PSTVSTPT

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Apr 26, 2021
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.