Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS)
Québec, Quebec, G1M 2S8, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07366827
Low back pain (LBP) represents a common musculoskeletal conditions worlwide, causing substantial disability and economic burden. While traditional semi-rigid lumbar supports are commonly prescribed to alleviate LBP symptoms, their effectiveness remains limited by their static mechanical properties and lack of adaptability to movement patterns. Motorized lumbar support offer a novel approach by allowing the application of controlled decompressive forces while maintaining functional mobility. This experimental study aims to compare the effectiveness between a motorized lumbar support and a standard semi-rigid support in adults with non-specific LBP. Seventy adults with non-specific low back pain (LBP) will be recruited. Primary outcomes (pain intensity and physical functioning [daily average]) will be collected daily, while secondary outcomes (average pain intensity over the last week, pain-related disability, etc.) will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 9 weeks after randomization.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Québec, Quebec, G1M 2S8, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
LBP represents a common musculoskeletal conditions, causing substantial disability and economic burden. Several strategies, such as education, exercise, manual therapy, psychological techniques and lumbar supports have been recommended for LBP mangement. While traditional semi-rigid lumbar supports are commonly prescribed to alleviate LBP symptoms, their effectiveness remains limited by their static mechanical properties and lack of adaptability to movement patterns. A motorized lumbar support, may offer a novel approach through application of controlled decompressive forces while maintaining functional mobility. An innovative battery-powered orthosis that provides adjustable traction between thoracic and pelvic components, potentially addressing underlying mechanical factors contributing to pain, will be tested in participants with chronic LBP.
This single-blind, parallel-group clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a motorized lumbar support with that of a standard semi-rigid lumbar support in adults suffering from non-specific LBP. Eligible participants will be adults aged 18 to 65 years experiencing LBP with an average pain score of at least 3 out of 10 in the past week, pain related-disability ≥10% at ODI, and pain relief must be present during manual traction (measured by a moderate improvement (+3) on a global rating of change scale. Exclusion criteria include specific spinal pathologies (e.g., fractures, spinal stenosis, cancer), presence of neuropathic pain (leg and back, of 4 at the DN4), pregnancy, high BMI (>32), respiratory and circulatory issues, osteoporosis, recent rib or pelvic fractures, and any contraindications to wearing lumbar supports. A total of 70 participants will be randomly assigned to wear either a motorized lumbar support or a semi-rigid lumbar support . The motorized lumbar support is a battery-powered lumbar orthosis with thoracic and abdominal belts connected by lateral supports. It applies adjustable decompression force to the spine while allowing movement. Each participant will be instructed to wear the assigned support for at least four hours per day over three weeks, excluding while sleeping.
To minimize bias in data collection, subjective variables will be evaluated using REDCap while objective variables will be collectedat research centre. The primary outcomes include daily pain intensity and physical functioning. Secondary subjective outcomes include pain-related disability, average pain intensity of the past week, pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, self-efficacy, acceptability and adverse effects.
The statistician performing the statistical analyses will be blinded to group allocation. Linear mixed models incorporating fixed effects for group (motorized vs. standard support), time, and their interaction, with participants included as a random effect will be used. Daily wearing of the lumbar support, age and self-reported sex will be included as covariates. Intention-to-treat will be used for the main analyses. Per-protocol analyses will be conducted as sensitivity analyses, with the latter including only those who adhered to the recommended usage (minimum 4 hours/day, 5 days/week for 3 weeks). The sample size of 70 participants (35 per group) is planned based on the ability to detect a 2-point difference on the pain scale, with 95% power, a significance level of 0.05, and an estimated 20% dropout rate.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will be advised to wear motorized lumbar support for a minimum of 4 hours and a maximum of 8 consecutive hours per day throughout the three-week study period. To reach the target of 4 hours, participants will gradually increase their daily wear time : 2 hours on the first day, 3 hours on the second day and 4 hours on the third day.
Participants will be advised to wear motorized lumbar support for a minimum of 4 hours and a maximum of 8 consecutive hours per day throughout the three-week study period. To reach the target of 4 hours, participants will gradually increase their daily wear time : 2 hours on the first day, 3 hours on the second day and 4 hours on the third day.
Time frame: Once a day for three weeks.
The numeric scale from 0 to 10 (0: no pain; 10: worst imaginable pain) will be used to rate average pain intensity experienced during the day.
Time frame: Once a day for three weeks.
The numeric scale from 0 to 10 (0: no difficulty functioning; 10: inability to function) will be used to rate the ability to carry out daily activities.
Time frame: Baseline, week 3 and 9.
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated and reliable 10-item questionnaire (0 = no disability; 100 = extremely severe disability) recommended for evaluating physical functioning in individuals with LBP.
Time frame: Baseline, week 3 and 9.
The 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = "no pain" to 10 = "the worst pain you can imagine") will be used to measure the average pain intensity over the past week.
Time frame: Baseline, week 3 and 9.
Pain catastrophizing will be evaluated using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-administrated questionnaire of 13 questions measuring catastrophizing thoughts contributing to pain on a 5-point likert scale ranging from 0 ("not at all", low level of catastrophizing thoughts) to 5 ("all the time", high level of catastrophizing thoughts).
Time frame: Baseline, week 3 and 9.
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a self-administrated questionnaire used to assess fear of movement using 17 questions on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree", low level of kinesiophobia) to 4 ("strongly agree", high level of kinesiophobia).
Time frame: Baseline, week 3 and 9.
Pain self-efficacy will be evaluated using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the confidence people with ongoing pain have in performing activities while in pain, on a 10-point scale from 0 ("not at all confident", low self-efficacy) to 10 ("completely confident", high self-efficacy).
Time frame: Week 3
Acceptability of wearing the lumbar support will be evaluated using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Acceptance will be measured using the extended version of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2).
Time frame: 3 weeks
All adverse will be documented and reported.
Time frame: Once a day for three weeks.
A "global rating of changes" question type ( "today, what was the effect of wearing the lumbar support") on a 15-point scale (-7 to +7, with -7 = "very great deal worse"; 0 = "no effect" ; +7 = "very great deal better") will be used.
The perceived effect of the lumbar support will be used only in the per protocol sensitivity analysis.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Laval University
Other
Effectiveness of a Motorized Lumbar Support for Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07709416
Non-specific Low Back Pain
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07555795
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07467070
Back Pain, Core Strength
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07737158
Agnosia, Nervous System Diseases
Beijing, China
View Trial Details