GGzE
Eindhoven, 5626ND, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT07599124
This study investigates whether the antidepressant effects of bright light therapy (BLT) differ between the spring/summer season and the autumn/winter season in adults with depressive disorders. While BLT is an established treatment for seasonal affective disorder, increasing evidence suggests it may also be effective for non-seasonal depression. However, it remains unclear whether its effectiveness depends on seasonal variation in natural daylight exposure.
In this prospective study conducted in a routine clinical care setting, patients referred for depressive symptoms and a score of > 6 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) receive BLT in a structured "Light Café" environment. Participants undergo daily morning light therapy sessions (30 minutes at 10,000 lux) for at least one week, with possible extension up to three weeks based on treatment response. A delayed-start design is used, where a subset of participants begins treatment two weeks later, allowing comparison with the natural course of depressive symptoms.
Depressive symptoms are assessed using the QIDS-SR at baseline, during treatment, and at follow-up (6 weeks and 3 months post-treatment). Sleep quality, chronotype, circadian timing, and side effects are also measured.
The primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of BLT across seasons. Secondary objectives include evaluating the persistence of treatment effects, assessing the change in sleep quality and day-to-day sleep-wake pattern, and exploring whether outcomes vary by chronotype, circadian phase, and patient characteristics.
This study aims to inform whether BLT should be considered a year-round treatment option for depressive disorders and to better understand factors influencing individual treatment response.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Eindhoven, 5626ND, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Relative Contraindications (require consultation with treating physician before participation):
Medication-Related Considerations:
Bright Light Therapy (BLT) will be administered according to Dutch depression guidelines, using Innolux LED light lamp (3800K, 10,000 lux). BLT will be given for one work week (Mon-Fri), 7:30-10:30 AM, 30 mins/session. Patients can have breakfast, read, or use devices. Treatment effectiveness will be evaluated using Self-Rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS-SR). If remission is achieved (QIDS-SR < 6), no additional treatment is given. If response is insufficient (QIDS-SR ≥ 6), 5 more sessions will be added in the following week, with maximum two extensions (1-3 weeks total).
Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment (approximately 1-3 weeks after initiation of light therapy)
Depressive symptom severity is assessed using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR), a validated 16-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 27 (higher scores indicating greater symptom severity). The primary outcome is the change in QIDS-SR score from baseline (pre-treatment) to end of light therapy. The analysis compares changes between participants treated in the spring/summer season and those treated in the autumn/winter season, while accounting for the delayed-start control condition.
Time frame: End of treatment to 6 weeks and 3 months post-treatment
Depressive symptom severity is assessed using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR), a validated 16-item questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 27 (higher scores indicating greater symptom severity). This secondary outcome evaluates the persistence of treatment effects by comparing post-treatment scores to follow-up scores.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months post-treatment
Sleep quality is measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a validated self-report questionnaire with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 (higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality). The outcome reflects change in sleep quality following light therapy.
Time frame: Baseline (chronotype assessment), end of treatment (1-3 weeks after initiation of light therapy), 6 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment
Chronotype is assessed using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). This outcome examines whether baseline chronotype moderates changes in depressive symptom severity following light therapy.
Time frame: At the end of each treatment week, up to 3 weeks
Side effects are assessed using a self-report questionnaire capturing the presence and severity of common light therapy-related symptoms (e.g., headache, eye irritation, sleep disturbances).
Time frame: Twice weekly during treatment, up to 3 weeks
Sleep timing, duration, quality and fragmentation, are assessed using a shortened sleep diary based on the Consensus Sleep Diary. This outcome evaluates changes in sleep patterns during light therapy and their relation to treatment response. Participants completed the diaries in the clinic on Mondays and Fridays, reporting retrospectively on their sleep during the preceding nights (i.e., Friday-Sunday nights for Monday entries and Monday-Thursday nights for Friday entries).
Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg Eindhoven (GGzE)
Other
Is the Antidepressant Effect of Light Therapy for People With a Depressive Disorder Comparable in the Spring/Summer vs Autumn/Winter?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03191058
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03711019
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03113968
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02530164
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Munich, Germany
View Trial Details