Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02615899

Effectiveness of Impairment Specific Exercises for Balance and Fall Risk in Community-Living Older Adults at Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Balance impairment is a key factor contributing to falls in older adults. Conceptually, clinicians may be able to prescribe targeted exercises if specific impairments can be identified. Objective Our objective was to use a model of balance subsystems to identify balance impairments and demonstrate the effectiveness of targeted (matched) exercises to improve balance and reduce fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. The investigators used the Balance Evaluation System Test (BESTest) as the model because it categorizes balance into 6 subsystems. Design Randomized, partially blinded, pretest-post-test clinical trial consisting of 2 Phases: 1. A comparison between impairment-matched exercises and a control, and 2. A comparison between impairment-matched and mismatched exercises. Setting Senior independent living community. Participants Adult volunteers (n = 40; aged 74-94) recruited as sample of convenience who met the criteria. Participants (n = 20) identified with impairment in the biomechanical (BC) constraints subsystem and participants (n = 20) with impairment in anticipatory postural adjustment (APA) subsystem were enrolled and randomized into 2 subgroups (matched and control/delayed mismatched; n = 10 each subgroup). Intervention Phase 1: Participants in the matched subgroup received a 6-week exercise program matched to their impaired subsystem while the mismatched subgroup served as control. Phase 2: Following the delay, participants in the mismatched group received a 6-week exercise program mismatched to their impairment. Measurements Primary outcome variables were scores on the targeted subsystem (BC, APA), BESTest total, Berg Balance Scale, and fear of falling measure. Quality of life was a secondary outcome. Outcome data were collected by the tester blind to pretest scores and group allocation. Results The matched exercise subgroups demonstrated both statistical and clinical improvement in all outcome variables compared to the control; and showed greater improvement in balance impairments compared to the mismatched subgroup, but not in fall risk reduction. Limitations The therapist who administered the pretest knew the subgroup assignment and implemented the exercises. Conclusions Results provide preliminary evidence that using a balance assessment model to identify impairments in the BC and APA subsystems and prescribing targeted exercises reduces these balance impairments for older adults and may warrant future studies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Drexel University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • individuals who met the criteria for a concurrent psychometric study (older adults aged 65 years and older, cognitively able to understand and follow simple instructions,and able to walk independently with or without an assistive device for more than 100 ft); and demonstrated
  • elevated fracture risk
  • elevated fall risk
  • impaired balance in either the BC or APA subsystem of balance as identified with BESTest.

Exclusion criteria

  • individuals who had:
  • a progressive diseases or unstable medical conditions
  • major surgery in the past 3 months
  • physician's orders not to participate in an exercise program for any reason
  • impairment in both BC and APA subsystems
  • impairments in more than a total of 3 subsystems
  • who were currently receiving treatment for balance or fall prevention.

Treatment and study plan

Matched: Targeted (specific) balance exercise interventions

Other

Mismatched: Untargeted (non-specific) balance exercise interventions

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. BESTest total

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Balance

  2. Targeted subsystem of BESTest (APA or BC subsystem)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Subsystem balance

  3. Berg Balance Scale

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Fall risk indicator

  4. the University of Illinois at Chicago Fear of Falling Measurement (UIC FFM)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Fall risk indicator

Secondary outcomes

  1. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12, Version 2; QualityMetric Inc.) questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Quality of Life indicator

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Drexel University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 26, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 26, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.