Effect of the MERCI Model in Gamified Disaster Midwifery Education

This form, created by researchers based on literature, includes questions about the participants' age, high school graduation, their self-sufficiency against disasters, etc.

This form was developed by researchers based on literature and based on the content of the disaster midwifery module used as a theoretical training module. The final version will be finalized based on expert opinion. Twenty multiple-choice questions were prepared, deemed appropriate for the research purpose and educational content. The form's performance will be evaluated out of 100 points. For this purpose, students' total success scores are calculated as five times the number of correct answers. Students will be evaluated by assigning "5" points for each correct answer and "0" points for each incorrect answer. The highest possible score for students on the information form is "100," and the lowest is "0."

Developed by Hong-Yan Li and his colleagues in 2017 and its Turkish validity safety studies were conducted by Koca et al. in 2018, the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale consists of 19 items and 3 sub-dimensions and the responses were taken using a 5-point Likert scale. A high score on the scale indicates a high level of disaster response self-efficacy. The scale has three sub-factors. Sub-factors are: "On-Site Rescue Competence (Items 1 - 11)", "Disaster Psychological Nurse Competence (Items 12 - 15)" and "The nature of the role undertaken in disaster and adaptation adequacy (Items 16 - 19)". The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the entire scale is 0.96. The Cronbach alpha values obtained for the sub-dimensions are; On-site rescue competence was determined as 0.93, psychological nurse competence in disaster was determined as 0.93, and the quality of the role undertaken in the disaster and adaptation competence was determined as 0.93 (Bennur et al., 2020).

The scale, which provides separate scores for self-confidence and anxiety, is a 6-point Likert-type scale consisting of 27 questions. The scale has three subscales for both the self-confidence and anxiety sections: "using sources to obtain information and listening fully," "using available information to identify the problem," and "knowing and taking action." Increasing scores in the self-confidence and subscales indicate increasing students' self-confidence in clinical decision-making. Low scores in the anxiety section and its subscales indicate low anxiety levels in clinical decision-making. The lowest possible score for the self-confidence and anxiety sections is 27, and the highest is 162. The total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the self-confidence section of the scale is 0.97, and the total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the anxiety section is 0.96 (Bektaş et al., 2017).

This form was developed by researchers based on literature and based on the content of the disaster midwifery module used as a theoretical training module. The final version will be finalized based on expert opinion. Twenty multiple-choice questions were prepared, deemed appropriate for the research purpose and educational content. The form's performance will be evaluated out of 100 points. For this purpose, students' total success scores are calculated as five times the number of correct answers. Students will be evaluated by assigning "5" points for each correct answer and "0" points for each incorrect answer. The highest possible score for students on the information form is "100," and the lowest is "0."

Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale: Developed by Hong-Yan Li and his colleagues in 2017 and its Turkish validity safety studies were conducted by Koca et al. in 2018, the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale consists of 19 items and 3 sub-dimensions and the responses were taken using a 5-point Likert scale. A high score on the scale indicates a high level of disaster response self-efficacy. The scale has three sub-factors. Sub-factors are: "On-Site Rescue Competence (Items 1 - 11)", "Disaster Psychological Nurse Competence (Items 12 - 15)" and "The nature of the role undertaken in disaster and adaptation adequacy (Items 16 - 19)". The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the entire scale is 0.96. The Cronbach alpha values obtained for the sub-dimensions are; On-site rescue competence was determined as 0.93, psychological nurse competence in disaster was determined as 0.93, and the quality of the role undertaken in the disaster and adaptation competence was determined as 0.93.

Description: The scale, which provides separate scores for self-confidence and anxiety, is a 6-point Likert-type scale consisting of 27 questions. The scale has three subscales for both the self-confidence and anxiety sections: "using sources to obtain information and listening fully," "using available information to identify the problem," and "knowing and taking action." Increasing scores in the self-confidence and subscales indicate increasing students' self-confidence in clinical decision-making. Low scores in the anxiety section and its subscales indicate low anxiety levels in clinical decision-making. The lowest possible score for the self-confidence and anxiety sections is 27, and the highest is 162. The total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the self-confidence section of the scale is 0.97, and the total Cronbach alpha coefficient of the anxiety section is 0.96 (Bektaş et al., 2017).

The form was developed by researchers to evaluate the impact of gamified disaster midwifery training on students' process experiences. The form includes items assessing system usability, motivational factors (badges, points, leaderboards), and game task cycles. It consists of 16 items designed using a five-point Likert scale (5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree).

This form was developed by researchers based on literature and based on the content of the disaster midwifery module used as a theoretical training module. The final version will be finalized based on expert opinion. Twenty multiple-choice questions were prepared, deemed appropriate for the research purpose and educational content. The form's performance will be evaluated out of 100 points. For this purpose, students' total success scores are calculated as five times the number of correct answers. Students will be evaluated by assigning "5" points for each correct answer and "0" points for each incorrect answer. The highest possible score for students on the information form is "100," and the lowest is "0."