María
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28005, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04336150
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of different modalities of hypopressive exercises and biofeedback with ultrasound in women with pelvic floor dysfunctions, considering the efficacy of the treatment as improving the specific quality of life related to pelvic floor dysfunctions and improvement of the muscular properties of the pelvic floor muscles.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28005, Spain
Female 18-65 years old
Inclusion criteria
Women diagnosed with pelvic floor dysfunction by their doctor. With minimum strength of the pelvic floor muscles of 3 according to Modified Oxford Score
Exclusion criteria
Women who are pregnant or women who have had a vaginal or caesarean birth in the past six months.
Women whose PFD is severe and the first indication is surgical (POP-Q grade III-IV prolapses).
Women with only urinary incontinence or fecal urgency. Women with pain in the pelvic-perineal region of 3 cm in the visual analog scale, where a score of 0 cm means no pain, and a score of 10cm, the maximum pain that the participant can imagine.
Women who have received pelvic floor physiotherapy treatment in the last 12 months.
Women who are unable to voluntarily contract the pelvic floor muscles, quantified by the Modified Oxford Score by a score less than or equal to 2.
Women with any pathology that may affect the treatment (neurological, gynecological or urological), or with recurrent urinary infection or hematuria.
Women with cognitive limitations to understand the information, answer the questionnaires, consent and / or participate in the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
See information included in arm/group descriptions.
Time frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be assessed by the PFIQ-7 Spanish version. The PFIQ-7 consists of 3 scales of 7 questions each taken from the Urinary Impact Questionnaire, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire, and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire. The 3 scales are scored from 0 (least impact) to 100 (greatest impact) and an overall summary score (0 to 300).
Time frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline: at baseline, after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be assessed by PFDI-20 that is both a symptom inventory and a measure of the degree of bother and distress caused by pelvic floor symptoms. The PFDI-20 includes 20 questions and 3 scales. Each of the 3 scales is scored from 0 (least distress) to 100 (greatest distress). The sum of the scores of these 3 scales serves as the overall summary score of the PFDI-20 and ranges from 0 - 300 and the higher the score, the worse quality of life. The 3 scales include questions taken from the following widely used outcome measures: Urinary Distress Inventory - 6 questions, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory - 6 questions, and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory - 8 questions collecting data about UI, POP and colorectal and anal symptoms.
Time frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be measured by Modified Oxford Scale to rate pelvic floor muscle contraction on a scale of 0-5: 0 = no contraction; 1 = minor muscle; 'flicker'; 2 = weak muscle; contraction; 3 = moderate muscle contraction; 4 = good muscle contraction and 5 = strong muscle contraction. T)
Time frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be measured by dynamometry (measured in GRAMS).
Time frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be measured by dinamometry (measured in GRAMS)
Time frame: 5 assessments to evaluate change from baseline after the intervention period (2 months from baseline), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the intervention.
It will be measured by Ultrasound
University of Alcala
Other
Effectiveness of Different Hypopressive Exercises for Treating Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Women: Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: HIPOSPFD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07693465
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Giza, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07268014
Birth, First, Female Urogenital Diseases
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05004402
Diastasis Recti, Female Urogenital Diseases
Warsaw, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07312617
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details