Ya-Fang Lin
Taipei, 108, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT05913830
This study aims to investigate the effect of auricular point sticking on constipation in patients with methadone
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, 108, Taiwan
This study is a randomized controlled trial, taking 72 methadone constipation patients from a hospital in the north as objects, and divided them into an auricular point group and a control group. The experimental group was given auricular point sticking, while the control group only used sticking cloth. The two groups were measured for constipation, TCM constitution, anxiety, depression and quality of life before the intervention and 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after the start.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusions:
The seeds of blancia blanc were fixed on the acupoints with patches. The intervention measure in the experimental group was auricular point sticking. The two groups received four measurements before the intervention and 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after the start; while the control group received no Auricular pressure.
Time frame: six weeks
There were significant between-group differences in Bristol Stool Type at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 between the two groups (p= .003, p < .001, p < .001, respectively). The distribution of Bristol Stool Types in the second week, the fourth week, and the sixth week of the above-mentioned auricular point sticking intervention in the two groups all had statistically significant differences.
Time frame: six weeks
The total score of the experimental group in the 2nd week and the 6th week was damp and hot (p < .05); the experimental group had a significant difference in the decrease of the total score of the qi stagnation in the 4th week and the 6th week (p < .05).
Time frame: six weeks
There was no significant difference in the scores of the Bayesian Anxiety Scale and depression between the experimental group and the control group at the 2nd week, 4th week and 6th week (p > .05).
Time frame: six weeks
There were significant differences in the decrease of the total score of the experimental group in the 2nd week, 4th week and 6th week (p < .05, p < .001, p < .001 respectively)
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.