Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy. University of Cadiz
Cadiz, 11009, Spain
NCT Number: NCT03197285
The aim of the present study is to value the effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to decrease pain and increase mobility in the cervical area compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in patients with chronic neck pain symptoms.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cadiz, 11009, Spain
Background:
In Physiotherapy there is a growing interest of authors to clarify the relationship between the visual system and the neck. Aspects such as deficiencies in eye movement during cervical rotation are common disorders in patients who have suffered whiplash trauma or have dizzy syndromes. On the other hand, deep muscle disorders of the neck are related to the decrease in cervical-ocular reflex. Furthermore, some disorders in eye movements in patients with idiopathic neck pain have been identified.
Consequently, a pragmatic approach to multimodal intervention has been recommended to address changes in sensorimotor control at the cervical level. For this purpose, head-neck sensitization exercises (joint position sense training with head relocation), oculo-motor exercises (ie, eye stability, eye-neck coordination) or balance training have been proposed. These programs lead to a sensorimotor control, reducing pain and disability in the neck. However, it is not known if this approach to treatment is a significant improvement when compared to the implementation of other physiotherapy procedures, so it is unknown if the application of training oculocervical proprioception is more advisable than other modalities of physiotherapy treatment for the improvement of CNP symptoms.
Material and method:
This research is an analytical, longitudinal, prospective, experimental, evaluator blinded study. It is controlled with two parallel groups, randomized clinical trial.
The sample consisted of patients recruited in a Physiotherapy consultation in Cadiz (Spain). These assessments were made before and after the start of program and to the end of intervention (8 months).
Patients were randomized to control or experimental group. All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol, no apply an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in subjects in the first group and performing an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in the second. This program was carried out by the physiotherapist. Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days.
This includes a total of 10 exercises that has proprioceptive reprogramming in the cervical area with the following phases:
Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful).
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
Algometer in 6 points (two trapezius, two in angular of the scapula and two sub-occipital)
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (4 weeks)
Measured with inclinometer
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
McGill questionnaire in Spanish version
Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
VAS visual analogue scale
University of Cadiz
Other
Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to Decrease Pain and Increase Mobility in the Cervical Area Compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Symptoms.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07710079
Arthralgia, Back Pain
Sialkot, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07691151
Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain, Neck Pain
Ajman, Ajman Emirate, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT04455048
Neck Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Bolu, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06835439
Back Pain, Chronic Pain
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial Details