Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04760535

Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion

Aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of Invisalign® First clear aligners compared to tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander on palatal morphology in growing subjects using 3D technology.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 year–10 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Turin

Turin, 10126, Italy

About this study

Aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of Invisalign® First clear aligners compared to tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander on palatal morphology in growing subjects using 3D technology. This two-arm parallel-group randomized prospective clinical trial will include patients with: indications for maxillary expansion treatment, age between 6 and 10 years old, mixed dentition, good standard of oral hygiene, good compliance during treatment as assessed by the practitioner. Patients will be assigned to one of two expansion methods (arm A: Invisalign® First clear aligners, arm B: tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander) according to a computer-generated randomization list shortly before the start of expansion Primary outcome measure will be the change in palatal morphology (palatal volume and surface area variations). Secondary outcomes will be: arch dimensions (upper inter-canine width, upper inter-molar width, anterior segment length, posterior segment length), complications, patients' satisfaction and periodontal health. Due to the nature of the intervention blinding will not be possible. Potential statistical differences between the two intervention groups will be evaluated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients who have been diagnosed with transverse maxillary deficiency;
  • mixed dentition phase with cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS) less than 4;
  • fully erupted upper and lower first molars;
  • transversal discrepancy ≤5mm
  • demonstration of a good standard of oral hygiene (determined through questioning and clinical examination);
  • subjects willing to consent to the trial and comply with the trial regime.

Exclusion criteria

  • any general medical health problems which may influence gingival health, such as those necessitating antibiotic cover as bacteremia prophylaxis, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, or physical or mental disability;
  • permanent teeth extraction-based treatment (third molars excluded);
  • morphologic crown anomalies;
  • auxiliary treatment during arch expansion stage (such as crossbite elastics);
  • posterior interproximal reduction;
  • orthognathic surgery treatment planned;
  • cleft palate or severe facial deformities.

Treatment and study plan

Invisalign® First Phase I treatment (Align Technology, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA)

Device

Subjects in this arm will be instructed to wear aligners 24h/day for entire duration of the therapy. They will be asked to remove their retainers only while eating, drinking (except water), or cleaning. At the time of appliance delivery, both written and verbal oral hygiene instructions were given, including methods for cleaning appliances themselves. Also, written informed consent were obtained for each patient or the parents.

Tooth-borne Hyrax-type maxillary expander

Device

The expansion protocol was one quarter-turn twice a day (0.45 mm activation per day) until overcorrection with the maxillary lingual cusps contacting the mandibular buccal cusps. The expander was left passively for retention for a minimum of 6 months. At the time of appliance delivery, both written and verbal oral hygiene instructions were given, including methods for cleaning appliances themselves. Also, written informed consent were obtained for each patient or the parents.

Primary outcomes

  1. Palate morphology

    Time frame: 12 months

    The primary outcome will be to evaluate the changes in palatal morphology after the treatment of maxillary deficiencies using two different therapies and to re-evaluate changes over the initial 12-months after the end of the treatment. The changes in palatal morphology are defined as the variation in palatal volume and surface. These will be measured from digitized study models within the boundaries of the palate, the gingival and distal planes, defined as follow. The gingival plane will be created by connecting the midpoints of the dentogingival junction of all upper erupted deciduous and permanent teeth. The distal plane will be created through two points at the distal of the first upper permanent molars perpendicular to the gingival plane.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Upper inter-canine width (ICW)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Upper inter-canine width (ICW) (secondary outcome measure) is the transverse distance between upper canines in millimeters.

  2. Upper inter-molar width (IMW)

    Time frame: 12 months

    Upper inter-molar width (IMW) (secondary outcome measure) is the transverse distance between upper first molars in millimeters.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of Aligners Versus Rapid Maxillary Expansion on 3D Palatal Volume in Mixed Dentition Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 18, 2021
Registry last updated
May 25, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.