Recharjme Multi-Modal Rest Cabin
DeviceEnclosed workplace cabin with guided meditation, massage, luminotherapy, and zero-gravity chair.
NCT Number: NCT07322354
This study examines whether access to a rest cabin in the workplace supports employee well-being. Employees of a Canadian insurance company are randomly assigned to one of two groups: immediate access to the rest cabin or a waiting-list control group that receives access after one month. The rest cabin is installed directly in the workplace and can be reserved for short sessions during the workday. It offers multiple relaxation options, including guided meditation, massage therapy, light therapy, and a zero-gravity chair. Employees choose which options to use during each session. Participants complete questionnaires before group assignment and again one month later. Employees who receive immediate access to the cabin also complete additional follow-up questionnaires at later time points. The study compares changes in general well-being and work-related outcomes between employees who have access to the cabin and those who do not during the initial study period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Worksite 3, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
This pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluates the effects of a multi-modal rest cabin on general and work-related well-being among employees of a Canadian insurance company. The study takes place in real-world workplace settings across multiple office locations. After providing informed consent, participants complete a baseline survey assessing general well-being and work-related outcomes. Participants are then randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) immediate access to the rest cabin or (2) a waiting-list control condition with delayed access. Employees assigned to the immediate-access group are encouraged to use the rest cabin over a four-week period. Cabin sessions are self-scheduled during work hours and are designed to be brief. The rest cabin is fully enclosed and located within the workplace. It includes several relaxation modalities, such as guided meditation, massage therapy, light therapy, and a zero-gravity chair. Participants are free to select and combine modalities based on their preferences during each session. Participants in both the immediate-access group and the waiting-list control group complete a follow-up survey one month after the baseline assessment. To examine whether any observed changes are maintained over time, participants in the immediate-access group also complete additional follow-up surveys two months and four months after baseline. It is hypothesized that workers in the experimental (vs. control) group would have better changes in scores in their general (positive and negative affect, flourishing, anxiety, depression, mindful attention awareness, insomnia) and workplace (thriving at work, burnout, absenteeism, presenteeism, job satisfaction, psychological detachment from work) positive and negative well-being when comparing Time 1 (follow-up survey) to Time 0 (baseline) (H1). Specific to those in the experimental condition, it is hypothesized that: positive changes observed following cabin use (at Time 1) would remain evident at the subsequent follow-up timepoints (Times 2 and 3), relative to baseline (H2), and changes in well-being outcomes between Time 1 and Time 0 would be greater for those who have used the cabin more often (H3). It is also hypothesized that: 4) the change in outcomes between T1 and T0 associated with being in the experimental (vs. control) condition (as discussed in H1) would be mediated by changes in psychological detachment from work and mindfulness awareness (H4), and 5) the relationship between cabin use frequency and changes in well-being outcomes (as discussed in H3) would be mediated by changes in psychological detachment and mindfulness awareness (also between T1 and T0; H5).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Enclosed workplace cabin with guided meditation, massage, luminotherapy, and zero-gravity chair.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the Employment Absence and Productivity Scale; Min.: 1; Max.: 5; Higher scores indicating a more negative outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Calculation based on the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire; Min.: 0; Max.: 100; Higher scores indicating a more negative outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using an adapted item from Life in Transition Survey; Min.: 1; Max.: 5; Higher scores indicating a more positive outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the two subscales of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4; Min.: 1; Max.: 4; Higher scores indicating a more negative outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the Insomnia Severity Index; Min.: 0; Max.: 4; Higher scores indicating a more negative outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the three subscales of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure; Min.: 1; Max.: 7; Higher scores indicating a more negative outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the Flourishing Scale; Min.: 1; Max.: 7; Higher scores indicating a more positive outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using Index of Psychological Well-Being at Work (Thriving at Work Subscale); Min.: 0; Max.: 5; Higher scores indicating a more positive outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (Carlson & Brown, 2005); Min.: 1; Max.: 6; Higher scores indicating a more positive outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using adapted items from Recovery Experience Questionnaire; Min.: 1; Max.: 5; Higher scores indicating a more positive outcome.
Time frame: Time 0 (baseline) to time 3 (four months after baseline)
Measured using the two subscales of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; Min.: 1; Max.: 5; For positive affect: higher scores indicating a more positive outcome; For negative affect, higher scores indicating a more negative outcome.
Laval University
Other
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of a Multi-Modal Rest Cabin in Boosting Worker Well-Being
Acronym: RECHARJME-RCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07342673
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07720297
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06085105
Adverse Outcomes, Behavior
Navrongo, Ghana
View Trial DetailsNCT07702682
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Elâzığ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details