University of Regina
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada
NCT Number: NCT05033184
Previous studies have demonstrated the need to move beyond the common misconception of midlife as a time of crisis so that further understandings of the midlife as a time of opportunity for the maintenance and improvement of health can be developed. Several psychosocial factors such as resilience, emotion regulation, perceived social support, and control beliefs have been identified as having a role in the adoption of healthier lifestyle habits in middle age which, in turn, may decrease the risk of a developing or worsening chronic disease. Several behaviour change interventions have also been proposed in the literature. As Canada's population ages, it is important that brief behaviour change interventions, and the psychosocial factors that facilitate such behaviour changes, be identified as a way to promote better health during the midlife years so as to improve the experience of aging. The present study is aimed at evaluating the influence of psychosocial factors on the adoption of healthy lifestyle habits. Specifically, this study aims to examine whether differing experiences of social support, resilience, emotion regulation, and control beliefs influence physical activity levels following a brief behaviour change intervention. Participants will be asked to complete a demographics questionnaire followed by a series of measures to determine the individual's perceived levels of social support, resilience, emotion regulation, and control beliefs. After completing this set of questionnaires, participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control condition. Participants in the experimental condition will be asked to complete the Brief Action Planning exercise as a way to identify a goal related to health behaviours. Participants in the control condition will be asked to identify a goal related to health behaviours without being introduced to the Brief Action Planning exercise. Two weeks and four weeks following this intervention, individuals will be asked to indicate the degree to which they were able to achieve their health goal. It is expected that individuals in the experimental condition will experience greater improvement in physical activity levels compared to individuals in the control condition. The investigators also anticipate that improvements in physical activity levels in the experimental condition will be influenced by the psychosocial factors of social support, resilience, emotion regulation, and control beliefs. The potential significance of this study includes increasing awareness of the influence of psychosocial factors on health behaviours and the possible effectiveness of a brief behaviour change intervention among middle-aged adults. Potential interventions may be used in clinical settings or community programs in which middle-aged adults engage.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Brief Action Planning exercise is a previously developed goal-setting exercise which has been designed to incorporate aspects of motivational interviewing such as compassion, acceptance, evocation, and partnership. It is a tool that allows participants to identify an aspect of their life they would like to improve upon and guides them through the process of making a specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely (SMART) goal. It also assesses their confidence in achieving this goal so as to assist with making alternative plans if confidence is low.
The Goal Setting exercise allows participants to identify an aspect of their life they would like to improve upon without incorporating aspects of motivational interviewing components or providing any guidance on how to set this goal.
Time frame: Baseline Period
Our final outcome measure will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The IPAQ will measure the degree to which participants spent time on vigorous, moderate, walking, and sitting activities. The IPAQ gets scored as categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels, and high activity levels). A score of high activity levels is assigned to those who engage in vigorous activities at least 3 days a week OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous activities. A score of moderate levels of physical activity will be assigned to those who engage in 3 or more days of vigorous activity and/ or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous activities. Those who do not meet the criteria for either vigorous or moderate will be scored as having low levels of activity.
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-Up Period
Our final outcome measure will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The IPAQ will measure the degree to which participants spent time on vigorous, moderate, walking, and sitting activities. The IPAQ gets scored as categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels, and high activity levels). A score of high activity levels is assigned to those who engage in vigorous activities at least 3 days a week OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous activities. A score of moderate levels of physical activity will be assigned to those who engage in 3 or more days of vigorous activity and/ or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous activities. Those who do not meet the criteria for either vigorous or moderate will be scored as having low levels of activity.
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-Up Period
Our final outcome measure will be the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The IPAQ will measure the degree to which participants spent time on vigorous, moderate, walking, and sitting activities. The IPAQ gets scored as categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels, and high activity levels). A score of high activity levels is assigned to those who engage in vigorous activities at least 3 days a week OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity, or vigorous activities. A score of moderate levels of physical activity will be assigned to those who engage in 3 or more days of vigorous activity and/ or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous activities. Those who do not meet the criteria for either vigorous or moderate will be scored as having low levels of activity.
Time frame: Baseline Period
The Confidence outcome asks the participant to rate how confident they feel in following their plan The degree to which participants report that they are confident about carrying out their plan over the next two weeks on a scale from 1 to 10, with scores above 7 indicating high confidence and scores below 7 indicating low confidence.
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-Up Period
The Confidence outcome asks the participant to rate how confident they feel in following their plan The degree to which participants report that they are confident about carrying out their plan over the next two weeks on a scale from 1 to 10, with scores above 7 indicating high confidence and scores below 7 indicating low confidence.
Time frame: 2-Week Fellow-Up Period
The Achievement outcome asks the participant to rate the degree to which they followed their plan over the previous two weeks by selecting either 'fully,' 'partially,' or 'not at all.'
Time frame: 4-Week Follow-Up Period
The Achievement outcome asks the participant to rate the degree to which they followed their plan over the previous two weeks by selecting either 'fully,' 'partially,' or 'not at all.'
University of Regina
Other
Effectiveness of a Brief Internet-delivered Behaviour Change Intervention Among Healthy Middle-aged Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02329262
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Bidwell, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04252677
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05696119
Athletic Injuries, Behavior
Lund, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT05621044
Behavior, Exercise
Golden, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details