Princess Filler Lidocaine
Devicecorrection of nasolabial folds
NCT Number: NCT03990883
Clinical Investigation to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of Princess Filler Lidocaine in the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me22 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gary Monheit, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Clinical Investigation to assess the effectiveness of "Princess Filler Lidocaine" in reducing the severity of nasolabial folds compared to "Juvederm Ultra XC", based on the independent blinded evaluating investigator live assessment using the Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) at Week 24 after initial treatment and relative to Baseline assessments
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Snellen visual acuity test worse than 20/40 (with corrective eyewear, if applicable), abnormal confrontational visual field test, or abnormal ocular motility test.
Repeat Treatment - Inclusion Criteria:
Repeat Treatment - Exclusion Criteria:
correction of nasolabial folds
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of responders based on the independent blinded evaluating investigator live assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and compared to Juvederm® Ultra XC. Responder is defined as having at least one grade improvement over Baseline, on the 5-point Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS). NLF-SRS scores are ranked as 0 (None/minimal), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe) and 4 (Extreme).
Hierarchical Testing Procedure:
This primary outcome measure is assessed first in a hierarchical testing sequence.
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of responders based on the independent blinded evaluating investigator live assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and compared to Juvederm® Ultra XC. Responder is defined as having at least one grade improvement over Baseline, on the 5-point Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS). NLF-SRS scores are ranked as 0 (None/minimal), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe) and 4 (Extreme).
Hierarchical Testing Procedure:
This is the second outcome measure in the hierarchical testing sequence. Statistical significance for this measure will only be assessed if the first outcome measure achieves statistical significance at the predefined alpha level (0.025).
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of responders based on the independent photographic reviewers assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and compared to Juvederm® Ultra XC and based on photographs. Responder is defined as having at least one grade improvement over Baseline, on the 5-point Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS). NLF-SRS scores are ranked as 0 (None/minimal), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe) and 4 (Extreme).
Hierarchical Testing Procedure:
This is the third outcome measure to be analyzed in the hierarchical testing sequence. Statistical significance for this measure will only be assessed if the first and second outcome measures achieve statistical significance at the predefined alpha level (0.025).
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of responders based on the independent photographic reviewers assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and compared to Juvederm® Ultra XC and based on photographs. Responder is defined as having at least one grade improvement over Baseline, on the 5-point Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS). NLF-SRS scores are ranked as 0 (None/minimal), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe) and 4 (Extreme).
Hierarchical Testing Procedure:
This is the fourth outcome measure in the hierarchical testing sequence. Testing for this measure is contingent upon statistical significance being demonstrated for the first three outcome measures at the predefined alpha level (0.025).
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of responders based on the treating investigator live assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and compared to Juvederm® Ultra XC. Responder is defined as having at least one grade improvement over Baseline, on the 5-point Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS). NLF-SRS scores are ranked as 0 (None/minimal), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe) and 4 (Extreme).
Hierarchical Testing Procedure:
This is the fifth outcome measure to be analyzed as part of the hierarchical testing sequence. Statistical significance will be assessed only if the first four outcome measures demonstrate statistical significance at the predefined alpha level (0.025).
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of responders based on the treating investigator live assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and compared to Juvederm® Ultra XC. Responder is defined as having at least one grade improvement over Baseline, on the 5-point Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS). NLF-SRS scores are ranked as 0 (None/minimal), 1 (Mild), 2 (Moderate), 3 (Severe) and 4 (Extreme).
Hierarchical Testing Procedure:
This is the sixth outcome measure to be analyzed as part of the hierarchical testing sequence. Statistical significance will be assessed only if the first five outcome measures demonstrate statistical significance at the predefined alpha level (0.025).
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of subjects with an improvement over Baseline (subjects who have been rated as "very much improved" or "much improved" or "improved"), based on the independent blinded evaluating investigator assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and using the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). GAIS grades are ranked as "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", and "worse".
Time frame: Week 24
The percentage of subjects with an improvement over Baseline (subjects who have been rated as "very much improved" or "much improved" or "improved"), based on subject assessment at Week 24 after initial treatment and using the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). GAIS grades are ranked as "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", and "worse".
Croma-Pharma GmbH
Industry
A Randomized, Subject- and Evaluating Investigator-blinded, Controlled, Multicenter, Split-face, Comparison Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Princess FILLER Lidocaine in the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Acronym: FILIDO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04755595
Dermatological Non-Disease
Brooklyn, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05896696
Dermatological Non-Disease
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04471896
Acne, Acne Vulgaris
New York, United States
View Trial Details