0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol
OtherImplementation of a 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol in routine care
NCT Number: NCT03421873
Chest pain is a common presenting complaint at the Emergency Department (ED). Many of these patients undergo lengthy assessments in the ED or are admitted which contributes to ED and hospital crowding as well as a substantial health care burden. The now commonly used high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable faster rule-out of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend the use of a 0h/1h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) protocol, but all studies so far have been observational. The safety and effectiveness of the protocol when implemented in routine care is thus unknown.
The aim of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the ESC 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol, supplemented with clinical assessment and ECG, when implemented in routine care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Helsingborg General Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
STUDY DESIGN:
ESC-TROP is a before-and-after implementation study with concurrent controls that will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol. The intervention group will consist of ED chest pain patients enrolled during 10 months after implementation of this protocol in routine care at the three intervention sites, and the control groups will be chest pain patients managed at the same EDs during the corresponding 10 months of the previous year, as well as chest pain patients managed during the same before-and-after period at two EDs not implementing the protocol (concurrent controls).
OBJECTIVES:
To determine the safety and effectiveness of the ESC 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol, supplemented with clinical assessment and ECG, when implemented in routine care.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:
All patients with an ED visit with a primary complaint of non-traumatic chest pain will be identified through the electronic ED patient log and screened for eligibility.
IMPLEMENTED PROTOCOL:
ESC guidelines state that the 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol should be used in conjunction with clinical assessment and the ECG, and these items are therefore incorporated in the protocol, which also reflects real-life practice. A 1h hs-cTnT is defined as a second hs-cTnT sample drawn 45 - 90 minutes from the sample at presentation (0h).
OUTCOMES:
Se outcomes section. Outcomes will be compared in the 10-month periods before and after the implementation at all five hospitals, and the differences in change will be compared between intervention and control hospitals.
FOLLOW-UP:
Follow-up will be performed using data from a comprehensive regional electronic patient record system as well as Swedish national registries.
DATA MANAGEMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES:
Data management and statistical analyses will be performed by Clinical Studies Sweden, Forum South. For the primary safety outcome, event rate after implementation (intervention group) will be compared to event rate in the control period using a non-inferiority approach
SAMPLE SIZE:
If it is assumed that the event rate is 0.4% among discharged patients in the control period and 0.5% after implementation, 4396 discharged patients would be needed both before and after the implementation (i.e. a total of 8792) to statistically determine that the event rate after implementation is non-inferior to that in the control period, with a two-sided alpha risk of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. The non-inferiority margin has been set to 0.5 percentage units as there is consensus that a <1% incidence of AMI/death within 30 days represents good safety for a diagnostic strategy in chest pain patients.
Based on a total of 13100 annual chest pain patients at the three EDs and a 25% exclusion rate, a study period of 10 months will give enrollment of about 8200 patients. If 55% are discharged from the ED, about 4500 patients will be discharged both before and after implementation (i.e. a total of about 9000).
With this sample size, and an estimated median ED length of stay (LOS) in discharged patients in the control group of 240 minutes, it will be possible to detect a difference in ED LOS of about 14 minutes with a power of 0.80 and alpha of 0.05. This sample size will thereby provide adequate power to detect a clinically significant difference in ED LOS for the co-primary outcome.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implementation of a 0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol in routine care
Time frame: 30 days from ED presentation
Comparison of the rate of AMI and all-cause death within 30 days from ED presentation in patients discharged from the ED during the intervention period versus the control period (safety)
Time frame: Through discharge from the ED, on average 5 hours after ED presentation
Comparison of ED length of stay in patients discharged from the ED during the intervention period versus the control period (effectiveness)
Time frame: Through discharge from the ED, on average 5 hours after ED presentation
Comparison of the proportion of patients discharged from the ED during the intervention period versus the control period
Time frame: 30 days from ED presentation
Proportion of patients fulfilling 0h/1h hs-cTnT criteria (0h hs-cTnT <5 ng/L or a 0h hs-cTnT <12 ng/L with a 1h increase <3 ng/L) who have undergone objective testing (exercise stress test, myocardial perfusion imaging, CT coronary angiography, coronary angiography) within 30 days during the intervention period.
Time frame: Throughout index hospital visit, on average 2 days after ED presentation
Comparison of the proportion of patients without acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admitted to the coronary care unit during the intervention period versus the control period.
Time frame: Throughout index hospital visit, on average 2 days after ED presentation
Comparison of the proportion of patients who undergo inappropriate coronary angiographies during the intervention period versus the control period
Time frame: Through discharge from the index hospital visit, on average 2 days after ED presentation
Comparison of total hospital length of stay during the intervention period versus the control period.
Time frame: 30 days from ED presentation
Comparison of the proportion of patients with 30-day ED revisits during the intervention period versus the control period.
Time frame: 30 days from ED presentation
Comparison of the proportion of discharged patients with admissions to inpatient care within 30 days during the intervention period versus the control period.
Time frame: 30 days from ED presentation
Comparison of health care costs within 30 days during the intervention period versus the control period. These data will be presented in a separate sub-study.
Ulf Ekelund
Other
Acronym: ESC-TROP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06404515
ASCVD, Acute Coronary Syndrome
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04125992
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Nablus, Palestinian Territories
View Trial DetailsNCT05409716
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Nablus, West Bank, Palestinian Territories
View Trial DetailsNCT02581540
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
View Trial Details