customized posture support
DeviceWe will provide customized modifications for seated or standing or walking devices based on the child's segmental level of control
NCT Number: NCT05391594
This study evaluates the effect of optimizing trunk support based on segmental principles of trunk control, on academic engagement of children in academic settings.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 month–21 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Children's Therapy Services, Connecticut Birth to Three, Cheshire, Connecticut, United States
Head and trunk posture control are foundational skills, impacting vision, communication, swallowing, eating, reaching, and gait. Vision, communication and upper extremity skills are critical for participation in educational settings. From an academic point of view, participants with poor trunk stability have difficulties staying erect and keeping their head and trunk steady. This interferes with concentration, reduces ability and aptitude for learning and can lead to fatigue and reduced time on task. Examination of the effect of optimal trunk support may yield critical information regarding academic engagement in children with moderate to severe disability.
The investigators propose to facilitate use of a segmental approach by physical and occupational therapists in educational settings. Activities will include identifying level of trunk control and applying segmental principles to adapt participant's positioning devices for optimal function.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
We will provide customized modifications for seated or standing or walking devices based on the child's segmental level of control
Time frame: On day 1 and one additional date at least 3 weeks later.
Frequency and duration of 'on task' behavior will be coded for 2 or 3 of the child's existing education goals under two conditions, when child is in usual positioning equipment and in segmentally optimized equipment. Goals of interest reflect motor behaviors that promote task performance or interaction. These include 1) eye gaze (at people or objects), 2) reaching, 3) object manipulation, 4) head turning and 5) making choices (using eye gaze or reach).
Time frame: On the day 1 and one additional date at least 3 weeks later.
frequency and duration of upright 'head position' will be coded for 2 or 3 of the child's existing education goals under two conditions, when child is in usual positioning equipment and in segmentally optimized equipment.
Time frame: from day 1 to second session at least 3 weeks later)
frequency and duration of device use and comments about child and teachers response to using the device.
University of Hartford
Other
Effect of Optimal Trunk Support on Academic Engagement of Children With Moderate to Severe Disability
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03797378
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02938130
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04026581
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Brain Damage, Chronic
Carnegie, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03525431
Abnormalities, Multiple, Birth Defect
Fresno, California, United States
View Trial Details