Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences
Istanbul, Maltepe, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT04214080
To investigate the effectiveness of neck and trunk stabilization exercises on communication and quality of life (QoL) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) with oral motor problems. Children with CP were randomly divided into Study Group (SG) and Control Group (CG). Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) approaches and oral motor therapy were applied to both groups. SG also received neck-trunk stabilization training.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 month–54 month
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Maltepe, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
In the multidisciplinary approach, special approaches to secondary problems, oral-motor trainings and communication studies are used in addition to Neurodevelopment treatment approach in the treatment of children with CP. Because of their impact on postural control, neck-trunk stabilization exercises are very important for therapeutic interventions designed to improve quality of life with activities of daily living.
As the increases in neck muscle strength are related to trunk stabilization, trunk stabilization exercises are thought to have positive effects on neck muscle strength. In addition, since the neck and trunk are complementary to each other, it is supported by the literature that neck stabilization exercises and trunk stabilization exercises should be applied together.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
NDT is a holistic and interdisciplinary clinical practice model informed by current and evolving research that emphasizes individualized therapeutic handling based on movement analysis for habilitation and rehabilitation of individuals with neurological pathophysiology.
Feeding and oral-motor intervention strategies have been developed to address difficulties with sucking, chewing, swallowing, and improve oral-motor skills.
Trunk control affects head control. After gaining head control, it causes jaw stability and oral motor control (tongue control and lip closure). All of these affect communication and quality of life.
Time frame: Change from VAS was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).
With VAS, families were asked to mark their communication status with their children. The definitions of the parameter to be evaluated are written on both ends of a 100 mm line. (0= no communication; 10= best communication). According to scale, the higher scores mean a better communication status
Time frame: Change from Katz was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).
Measures the capacity of a child to perform the activities that he/she has to do frequently in his/her daily life. The index has 6 questions. The patient gets 1 point if he/she makes each item independently; 0 points if he/she makes dependent. In the total score, 6 points indicate that patient is independent and 0 points indicate that patient is fully dependent. Higher Katz Index score means the better Activities of Daily Living.
Time frame: Change from PedsQL was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).
It is a quality of life scale that measures health-related quality of life of children. It consists of 21 items. Items are scored between 0-100. The higher total score means a better health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Change from SF-36 was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).
Quality of life of mothers was assessed by using the short form 36 questionnaire. It evaluates 8 sub-parameters, consisting of 36 items. 0= poor quality of life; 100= good quality of life. The higher score means a better health-related quality of life
Time frame: Change from VSS was assessed in 0 week (Baseline, in the first session), 6. week (6 weeks after treatment, in the 12th session).
This scale has been developed to classify children's speech production. The scale has 4 levels. (Level 1= Speech is not affected by motor disorder; 4= No understandable speech). The low scores mean good speech production.
Time frame: Immediately before the intervention, the evaluation was performed in the first session (only one time).
The gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy can be categorised into 5 different levels for the clear description of a child's current motor function. The higher level in GMFCS, means a worse and severe outcome. (Level I = Children walk without any limits; Level V= Children are limited in their ability to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures and control leg and arm movements). The low levels means good motor function.
Time frame: Immediately before the intervention, an evaluation was performed in the first session (only one time).
CFCS provides 5 levels (CFCS I, II, III, IV, V) to describe everyday communication performance. The higher level in CFCS means a worse and severe outcome. Level 1= effective sender and receiver with unfamiliar and familiar partners; level 5=seldom effective sender and receiver even with familiar partners.
Low levels mean good communication performance
Marmara University
Other
Evaluation of The Effect of Neck and Trunk Stabilization Exercises on Quality of Life and Communication in Children With Cerebral Palsy With Oral Motor Problem
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03264339
Behavior, Brain Damage, Chronic
Trondheim, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT04500782
Behavior, Brain Damage, Chronic
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04149561
Behavior, Brain Damage, Chronic
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02166801
Behavior, Brain Damage, Chronic
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial Details