Federal university of minas gerais
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT06040190
Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) is characterized by a burning sensation on the tongue or other areas of the mouth, often bilateral but occasionally unilateral. It is more prevalent in postmenopausal women. No specific ethnic or socioeconomic predisposition has been identified. The etiology and pathophysiology of BMS remain unknown. Various treatment approaches have been proposed, yielding conflicting outcomes and underscoring the need for further investigation.
Patients with BMS appear to respond well to long-term therapy involving systemic antidepressants and anxiolytics. The most promising therapeutic effects have been observed with clonazepam, which leads to a significant reduction in pain when applied topically or systemically. Capsaicin, an herbal remedy, also presents as an alternative treatment option, showing positive results in alleviating BMS symptoms when compared to a placebo. Photobiomodulation represents another non-pharmacological treatment possibility. It's analgesic action is possibly attributed to the inhibition of pain mediators. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is dietary supplement employed in BMS treatment. It serves as a potent antioxidant naturally produced within the body, contributing to the mitigation of skin aging and reinforcing the effects of other biological antioxidants. Based on these findings, attempts have been made to demonstrate ALA's effectiveness in BMS management, concluding that ALA may offer benefits in this context.
Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate, in adults with BMS, the impact of different therapeutic approaches on frequency, intensity, and location of pain, as well as on on quality of life.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants rinsed with a placebo solution (0.1% saccharin, 0.05% flavoring, 1% paraben solution, propylene glycol q.s. 20 mL; no active ingredient) compounded by Manipulatta Pharmacy (Belo Horizonte, MG) to be organoleptically identical to clonazepam (Rivotril®) in color, flavor, and odor. Ten drops were diluted in 10 mL of water and swished near the painful sites for 3 minutes without swallowing, then expectorated. The protocol was repeated three times daily for 21 days. Solution was provided in two 20 mL amber vials.
Participants rinsed with a clonazepam solution (Rivotril® 2.5 mg/mL; 10 drops = 1 mg) diluted in 10 mL of water, holding the liquid near the painful sites for 3 minutes without swallowing, then expectorating. The protocol was repeated three times daily for 21 days. Each participant received two 20 mL amber vials of the clonazepam 2.5 mg/mL solution.
Participants in this group will be instructed to take oral capsules containing alpha-lipoic acid.
Participants in this group will to apply the gel containing tocapsaicin on painful oral sites.
Photobiomodulation will be applied during 10 seconds per point at 56 points (three on the vestibular mucosa of the 4 quadrants, four on each labial mucosa, six on each of the two buccal mucosae, six on the hard palate, four on each lateral edge of the tongue, six on the dorsum of the tongue, and four sublingual points) with an intermediate distance of 2 mm. A dose of 12 J/cm² per session will be applied in continuous mode for 10 sessions. The 10 sessions will be applied twice a week for 5 consecutive weeks. The LASER will be applied perpendicularly in contact with the mucosa. All patients and the clinician will wear protective glasses.
Other names: photodynamic therapy
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Change in pain scores measured by a visual analog scale and the short version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Visual Analogue Scale: values ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain). The McGill instrument contains 15 descriptors of pain sensation (11 sensory and 4 affective), with each descriptor ranked on a 4-point rating scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe). Three measures of pain experience based on sensory and affective descriptors can be obtained: (1) The total index consists of the sum of all 15 descriptors with the total score ranging from 0 to 45; (2) The sensory index consists of the sum of descriptors 1 - 11 with the total score ranging from 0 to 33; and (3) the affective index consists of the sum of descriptors 12 - 15 with the total score ranging from 0 to 12.
Time frame: baseline and 2 months
Change in pain scores measured by a visual analog scale and the short version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Visual Analogue Scale: values ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain). The McGill instrument contains 15 descriptors of pain sensation (11 sensory and 4 affective), with each descriptor ranked on a 4-point rating scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe). Three measures of pain experience based on sensory and affective descriptors can be obtained: (1) The total index consists of the sum of all 15 descriptors with the total score ranging from 0 to 45; (2) The sensory index consists of the sum of descriptors 1 - 11 with the total score ranging from 0 to 33; and (3) the affective index consists of the sum of descriptors 12 - 15 with the total score ranging from 0 to 12.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Change in quality of life measured by Oral Impacts on Daily Performance scores. Total score ranging from 0 to 275 being classified as: 0 = no impact, values 1 to 10 = low impact, values 11 to 40 = medium impact and values 41 to 275 = high impact (i.e, worse quality of life).
Time frame: baseline and 2 months
Change in quality of life measured by Oral Impacts on Daily Performance scores. Total score ranging from 0 to 275 being classified as: 0 = no impact, values 1 to 10 = low impact, values 11 to 40 = medium impact and values 41 to 275 = high impact (i.e, worse quality of life).
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Other
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Treatments on Pain Scores and Self-reported Oral Health-related Quality of Life in Individuals With Burning Mouth Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07381361
Burning Mouth Syndrome, Low Level Laser Therapy
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07721090
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Behavior
View Trial DetailsNCT07506018
Burning Mouth, Burning Mouth Syndrome
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05819697
Burning Mouth Syndrome, Mouth Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details