Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, 0424, Norway
NCT Number: NCT02727192
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance in adults, with prevalence expected to rise significantly the coming decades. The occurrence of AF is associated with significantly increased mortality as well as morbidity of which cerebrovascular accidents is the most important. Unfortunately treatment options remain limited. Anti-arrhythmic drugs are widely used but have limited efficacy and the potential for toxicity and adverse events are recognized. Recent year's catheter ablation of AF continues to gain acceptance for symptomatic treatment, but recurrence rate are high with need for continuous medication. Thus there is a need to better understand what causes development and triggers episodes of AF as well to introduce new treatment options. Cardiometabolic factors such as obesity, inactivity and sleep apnea (SA) have therefore gained interest. Many patients with AF have chronic sleep apnea, and in the present study the investigators want to explore the interaction between SA and AF. The hypothesis of the present study is that SA may trigger AF and that treatment of SA will reduce the overall burden of AF as well as reduce the recurrence of AF after pulmonary vein ablation. To test the hypothesis the investigators will implant a Reveal device that continuously records the hearts rhythm of 100 patients with paroxysmal AF and concomitant SA. Initially the influence of SA on onset of AF will be examined, and the patients will then be randomized to treatment of SA or not and the influence on total AF burden recorded both before and after ablation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Oslo, 0424, Norway
For the present project the investigators have established a research team from 2 different university hospitals. This team, including high ranked, internationally renowned scientist from both clinical and basic sciences, will make a framework for PhD candidates and will ensure the patient cohort. Patients with paroxysmal AF and SA will be examined with an extensive diagnostic battery including advanced cardiac imaging tools allowing a proper description of the heart. Then a Reveal that continuously monitor the rhythm of the heart will be inserted, allowing the influence of SA, physical activity, inflammatory parameters, and other external variables on total AF burden to be examined. The patients will then be randomized to treatment of SA with a CPAP or not, and the AF burden recorded 6 months before ablation and 6 months after.
The present investigations carried out, are expected to results in better understanding of the interaction between AF and SA and may lay the scientific basis for better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for patients with AF. In addition, given the advantage of continuous Reveal® recording of the patient's heart rhythm, the present study will examine possible triggers of AF such as activity level and inflammatory substances, and examine the role of structural abnormalities in the heart as assessed by echocardiography for the triggering of AF episodes. An overall aim is therefore a better phenotyping of the patient which could aid in a more person-specific treatment approach, with direct consequences both for the individual patient and for the society.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be randomized to treatment of Sleep Apnea with a CPAP or control
Time frame: Baseline (pre-randomization) was the first month of loop recorder data collection and was compared to the last three months of the intervention period.
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in change of AF burden (% of time in AF, as measured by loop recorder) from baseline (one month prior to randomization) to the last three months of the five month intervention period.
Time frame: Baseline to the last month of intervention period
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in change of AF burden (% of time in AF, as measured by loop recorder) from baseline (one month prior to randomization) to the last month of the intervention period.
Time frame: Comparing Baseline to the last five months of the intervention period
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in change of AF burden (% of time in AF, as measured by loop recorder) from baseline (one month prior to randomization) to the last five months of the intervention period (the whole intervention period).
Time frame: Baseline to last three months of the intervention
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in the proportion of patients with at least 25% reduction of AF burden (% of time in AF, as measured by loop recorder) from baseline (one month prior to randomization) to the last three months of the intervention period.
Time frame: 12 months
Change of recurrence rate after ablation, as measured by loop recorder, after 6 months post ablation and after 12 months post ablation.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Change in AF symptoms between CPAP treatment and usual care. The questionnaire quantifies three domains of AF: event frequency (score 1-10), duration (score 1-10), and global episode severity (score 1-10). The total AF burden is calculated from the modified sum of the frequency, duration, and severity of AF (score 3-30, with higher scores indicating greater AF burden ). In addition, the AFSS assesses a symptom score based on seven items asking how bothered patients are by specified symptoms (score 0-35). Global well-being is a visual analogue scale ranging from 1 to 10 (10 indicating the best possible life).
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months, baseline and 6 months reported.
Difference between CPAP and usual care in QoL as assessed by SF36, Version 1.2. Item scores are transformed into the Physical and Mental Component Summary scores (PCS and MCS). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months. Baseline and 6 months reported
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in Change in daytime sleepiness as measured using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score, with scores ranging from 0 to 24 (most sleepy)
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Change in sleep quality and symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea as measured using the Berlin Questionnaire. Positive scores in two or more categories suggest a high risk of OSA.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months. Baseline and 6 months reported.
Change in sleep quality and symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea as measured using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ). Score range is 5-20 Points, with higher scores indicating better functional status.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Change in sleep quality and symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea as measured using the STOP-Bang Questionnaire. Score between 0-8. A score of ≥3 suggest risk for OSA.
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months. Baseline and 6 months reported.
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in change of CRP
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months and 18 months. Baseline and 6 months reported.
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in change of left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed by ecco
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months. Baseline and 6 months reported.
Difference between PAP treatment and usual care in change of Cardiac marker of NT-proBNP.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Examine the effect of SA treatment on gene Expression of white blood cells. Is paroxysmal AF Associated with specific gene Expression patterns? Examine the influence of SA treatment on the pattern of gene Expression and if this is related to reduction of atrial fibrillation burden
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Examine if onset of paroxysmal AF is Associated with specific Activity patterns, as assessed by garmin Vivofit2/3, Activity recording
Time frame: Baseline to follow up 6 months
Change in body composition (BMI) as assessed by Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) (Tanita)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months
Lung function test as assessed by spirometry
Oslo University Hospital
Other
Sleep Disordered Breathing in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03217383
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03927547
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Puno, Peru
View Trial DetailsNCT01832532
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04086407
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details