University of Valencia
Valencia, 46010, Spain
NCT Number: NCT02950909
The primary aim of this study therefore is to investigate the effects on pain and disability of an emphasized exercise program targeting the deep neck extensor semispinalis cervicis and a general exercise program for all neck extensor muscles in patients with chronic neck pain. As a secondary aim , pain intensity (VAS), cervical ROM, pressure pain threshold (PPT), cervical and thoracic posture and self-perceived benefit of treatment (GROC) were measured. The investigators hypothesized that both exercise programs would have similar effects on pain alleviation and pain related disability, but that the emphasized exercise program for the deep semispinalis cervicis would improve its activation more compared to the general exercise program. The results of this study will be relevant for designing effective rehabilitation/training programs for patients with chronic neck pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Valencia, 46010, Spain
An independent group, repeated-measures study design was adopted to investigate the immediate effect of two different kinds of intervention: Emphasized exercises targeting the deep cervical extensors and general exercises targeting all neck extensors. Subjects were randomized into two exercise groups: the emphasized exercise group in which patients performed muscle contractions against resistance directly at the neck and the general exercise group in which the resistance was applied at the head. Sealed opaque envelopes were used to conceal allocation.
Exercise regimes was of 6-weeks duration and started within one week of the initial assessment. All subjects received personal instruction and supervision by one experienced physiotherapist, once a week, for the duration of the whole program.
Subjects received an exercise diary and were requested to practice their respective regime twice per day for the six-week duration of the trial, without provoking neck pain and with attention to correct performance of the exercises. Exercises at home occurred for a period of no longer than 15 to 20 minutes twice per day. Subjects were asked not to seek other interventions for neck pain during the duration of the study, although usual medication was not withheld.
All patients performed two static exercises and one dynamic exercise. The only difference between both groups was the location of the resistance, which was in the lower cervical spine approximately at level C4 for the emphasized exercise group and at the occiput for the general exercise group.
The dosage for both exercise regimes required maximal muscle activation of the patient because it was shown that at this dosage the emphasized exercise results in muscle activation of about 20% to 25% MVC (Maximum Voluntary Contraction) and the general exercise of about 50% MVC (Schomacher et al., 2015). Patients were asked therefore to perform the exercises at their individual maximal force for a short time without provoking any pain neither during nor after the exercise. That is, submaximal effort without evoking pain during and after the exercises was used.
All exercises were repeated each for 3 sets with a break of 1-2 minutes between the sets. The two static exercises consisted of 6 repetitions of 6 seconds hold in each position with 6 seconds rest between each contraction. The dynamic exercise was performed with 6 repetitions through the whole range of motion with 2-3 seconds for each repetition without any rest between the repetitions. A break between the repetitions was added if necessary to avoid pain (Table 1). Patients repeated the exercise session one time per week under supervision of a physiotherapist, during 6 weeks. In addition, patients performed the exercise session twice per day seven days per week at home. Each exercise session lasted about 20 - 25 minutes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Emphasized activation of the deep neck extensors was searched for applying a localized resistance with the thumb and index finger at the level of the vertebral arch of C4 while pushing into flexion in a ventral-cranial direction, approximately parallel to the surface of the zygapophyseal joint, asking the patient to resist maximally during 6 seconds in sitting position
The patient was asked to fix his gaze at an object lying between both elbows hoping to in order to emphasize extension in the lower cervical spine and consequently activation of the extensors in this region.
Emphasized activation of all neck extensors was searched for applying the resistance with the therapist's hand or a wall respectively a towel at the occiput in sitting position
. The patient was asked to fix his gaze at an object lying between both hands. Extension consequently occurred in the entire cervical spine.
Time frame: 3 months
Variation in the Neck Disability Index scale
Time frame: 6 months
Variation of 2 or more in the Scale
Time frame: 7 weeks
Measurements in goniometric degrees for neck flexion, extension, sidebending (left and right) and rotation (left and right)
Time frame: 7 weeks
Measurement using a digital algometer positioned over the zygapophyseal joints of C2 and C5 on the most painful side, or on the right side when both sides were equally painful. In addition, a remote PPT site on the right tibialis anterior
Time frame: 7 weeks
Modification of the perceived pain and disability status with the questionary
Moisés Giménez Costa
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06835439
Back Pain, Chronic Pain
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06849999
Anxiety Disorders, Chronic Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06522893
Chronic Pain, Neck Pain
Almería, Almeria, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07462416
Central Nervous System Sensitization, Chronic Pain
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details