A
ProcedureLV lead placement in region of latest mechanical velocity (tissue doppler)
NCT Number: NCT00399594
Identifying & optimizing strategies to reduce the burden of heart failure is vital. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, patients with heart failure are at high risk for death & hospitalization. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) synchronizes ventricular mechanical activity, improves cardiac output & reduces HF symptoms. However, ~50% of patients do not clearly respond to CRT. Sub-optimal placement of the LV pacing lead appears to be an important reason for non-response.
This study will assess whether targeted LV lead placement will result in an increased probability of CRT response at 52 weeks vs. usual (lateral wall) lead placement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Background. Identifying & optimizing strategies to reduce the burden of heart failure (HF) is vital. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, patients with HF are at high risk for death & hospitalization. Over 25% of patients with systolic HF have dyssynchronous ventricular contraction that results in paradoxical septal motion, further impairing left ventricular (LV) function & HF progression. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) synchronizes ventricular mechanical activity, improves cardiac output & reduces HF symptoms. However, ~50% of patients do not clearly respond to CRT. Sub-optimal placement of the LV pacing lead appears to be an important reason for non-response.
Screening. Mechanical synchrony is vitally important in optimizing CRT response. Patients will be pre-screened with echocardiograms (echo) & CRT provided to only those with dyssynchrony. The predicted rate of CRT response in patients pre-screened for dyssynchrony is estimated at 65%.
CRT response. The combined use of a valid & simple measure of functional capacity with a reproducible measure of LV volume is optimal in identifying CRT responders. These outcomes will be assessed using the Specific Activity Scale & radionuclide angiography (RNA), respectively.
Primary hypothesis. Targeted LV lead placement will result in an increased probability of CRT response at 52 weeks vs. usual (lateral wall) lead placement. CRT response will be defined as ≥ 10% relative reduction in LV end systolic volume & ≥ 1 Specific Activity Scale class improvement.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
LV lead placement in region of latest mechanical velocity (tissue doppler)
LV lead placement in standard (lateral / posterolateral) position.
Time frame: over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Change over 12 months
Time frame: Study duration
Time frame: Study duration
University of Calgary
Other
Investigating Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization: Evaluation of Methods to Eliminate Non-response & Target Appropriate Lead Location (INCREMENTAL).
Acronym: INCREMENTAL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00541541
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Cardiovascular Diseases
Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT02729922
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00400985
Cardiovascular Diseases, Disease
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT00262119
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rome, Italy
View Trial Details