Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00399594

Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Identifying & optimizing strategies to reduce the burden of heart failure is vital. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, patients with heart failure are at high risk for death & hospitalization. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) synchronizes ventricular mechanical activity, improves cardiac output & reduces HF symptoms. However, ~50% of patients do not clearly respond to CRT. Sub-optimal placement of the LV pacing lead appears to be an important reason for non-response.

This study will assess whether targeted LV lead placement will result in an increased probability of CRT response at 52 weeks vs. usual (lateral wall) lead placement.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background. Identifying & optimizing strategies to reduce the burden of heart failure (HF) is vital. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, patients with HF are at high risk for death & hospitalization. Over 25% of patients with systolic HF have dyssynchronous ventricular contraction that results in paradoxical septal motion, further impairing left ventricular (LV) function & HF progression. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) synchronizes ventricular mechanical activity, improves cardiac output & reduces HF symptoms. However, ~50% of patients do not clearly respond to CRT. Sub-optimal placement of the LV pacing lead appears to be an important reason for non-response.

Screening. Mechanical synchrony is vitally important in optimizing CRT response. Patients will be pre-screened with echocardiograms (echo) & CRT provided to only those with dyssynchrony. The predicted rate of CRT response in patients pre-screened for dyssynchrony is estimated at 65%.

CRT response. The combined use of a valid & simple measure of functional capacity with a reproducible measure of LV volume is optimal in identifying CRT responders. These outcomes will be assessed using the Specific Activity Scale & radionuclide angiography (RNA), respectively.

Primary hypothesis. Targeted LV lead placement will result in an increased probability of CRT response at 52 weeks vs. usual (lateral wall) lead placement. CRT response will be defined as ≥ 10% relative reduction in LV end systolic volume & ≥ 1 Specific Activity Scale class improvement.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • LV EF ≤ 0.40 measured within 3 months of enrollment,
  • SAS class 3 or 4 symptoms indicative of moderate to severe functional capacity limitation due to heart failure within 1 month of enrollment.
  • Confirmed dyssynchrony on screening echo (1.1.9), &
  • On stable doses of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II blocker & a beta-blocker for ≥ 2 months unless medically contra-indicated.
  • Controlled heart rate if in permanent AF (resting <70 & maximal <120).

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent,
  • Medical condition other than heart failure likely to cause death < 1 year,
  • Cardiac transplant planned within 6 months,
  • Known contra-indication to transvenous CRT device implant (e.g., active sepsis, artificial tricuspid valve, known vascular occlusion that will prevent delivery of leads transvenously),
  • Clinically significant myocardial infarction within last 2 months, or
  • Coronary bypass graft surgery ≤ 2 months or coronary angioplasty ≤ 1 month

Treatment and study plan

A

Procedure

LV lead placement in region of latest mechanical velocity (tissue doppler)

B

Procedure

LV lead placement in standard (lateral / posterolateral) position.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in end systolic volume plus reduction in symptoms

    Time frame: over 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  2. Short form thirty six score.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  3. Specific Activity Scale score.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  4. New York Heart Association class.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  5. Six minute walk distance.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  6. LV volumes.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  7. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

    Time frame: Change over 12 months

  8. Mortality

    Time frame: Study duration

  9. Hospitalization

    Time frame: Study duration

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary

Other

Collaborators

  • Cambridge Heart Inc.
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Hoffmann-La Roche
  • Medtronic

Registry information

Official study title

Investigating Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization: Evaluation of Methods to Eliminate Non-response & Target Appropriate Lead Location (INCREMENTAL).

Acronym: INCREMENTAL

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 15, 2006
Registry last updated
Nov 24, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.