Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06249464

Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Pharyngeal Dysphagia After Cerebralvascular Accident

This was a multicenter randomized controlled study. 66 post-stroke patients with pharyngeal dysphagia were randomly allocated to the observation group (n=33) or the control group (n=33). Both groups were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation including routine rehabilitation and swallowing function training. Besides, the observation group additionally underwent the stellate ganglion block (SGB). At admission and after 20-day treatment, Kubota water swallowing test, video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), and Rosenbek penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) were used to assess swallowing function.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Xinzhu Rehabilitation Hospital

Xinzhu, Taiwan

About this study

Dysphagia is a frequent and potentially serious complication of stroke. However, there is no effective measure for the treatment of pharyngeal dysphagia in stroke patients. This study aims to explore the efficacy of stellate ganglion block in post-stroke pharyngeal dysphagic patients who received comprehensive rehabilitation. This was a multicenter randomized controlled study. 66 post-stroke patients with pharyngeal dysphagia were randomly allocated to the observation group (n=33) or the control group (n=33). Both groups were provided with comprehensive rehabilitation including routine rehabilitation and swallowing function training. Besides, the observation group additionally underwent the stellate ganglion block (SGB). At admission and after 20-day treatment, Kubota water swallowing test, video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), and Rosenbek penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) were used to assess swallowing function.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 30 and 80 years;
  • New-onset stroke;
  • The course of disease between 1 to 6 months;
  • With pharyngeal dysphagia;
  • Stable vital signs;
  • Voluntary participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergy to Lidocaine injection or vitamin B12 injection;
  • Severe cognitive impairment;
  • Coagulation disorders;
  • Severe dysfunction of organs including heart, lungs, kidney, liver, etc.;
  • Complicated with other neurological diseases;
  • Dysphagia caused by other diseases or reasons.

Treatment and study plan

comprehensive rehabilitation

Behavioral

All the participants were provided with the comprehensive rehabilitation (routine rehabilitation and swallowing function training). The routine rehabilitation included intervention for risk factors (blood pressure, blood lipids, blood glucose, smoking and alcohol restriction, exercise, etc.) and pharmacological treatment (aspirin, statins, anticoagulants, etc.).

Regrading swallowing function training, both groups were given swallowing function training, including 1) exercises of closure of the vocal folds, pharyngeal, and laryngeal muscles exercises, and respiratory muscle strength training, for 15 min each time and twice per day. 2) isotonic/isometric swallowing exercises, supraglottic swallowing exercises, and the Mendelsohn maneuver, for 20 min each time and twice per day. 3) effortful swallowing exercises, and cough reflex training, for 10 min each time and twice per day.

Lidocaine Hydrochloride

Drug

the observation group was given SGB once a day, with 10 sessions as a course of treatment and each side of the body for one course. All the materials included: 1) 1.5ml of 2% Lidocaine hydrochloride injection (1ml: 0.5mg), Vitamin B12 Injection 500ug (1ml: 0.5g), the 5 ml disposable syringe and the sterile disposable dental injection needles. The specific operation procedure was as follows[16]: The operator stood at the patient's block side, and the patient was placed in the supine position, with the head leaning 45 degrees toward the contralateral side of the block side. After routine disinfection of the skin, a paratracheal approach was adopted, which was, 2.5cm above the sternoclavicular joint and 1.5cm outside the midline of the neck.

Primary outcomes

  1. Video fluoroscopic swallowing study

    Time frame: day 1 and day 20

    The patient was required to take a sitting position with the head naturally upright. Under the guidance of the examiner, the patient first swallowed 5ml of iohexol solution (50ml:17.5g in iodine terms). If the patient exhibited aspiration, the test would stop. If not, the patient was instructed to swallow 10ml of iohexol solution mixed with breadcrumbs, and the patient's swallowing condition was observed with immediate measures ready to take for safety. Specially, the esophageal phase was not included in the study, because it was commonly regarded as an independent phase. The swallowing were divided into 3 phases in this assessment: Oral phase, Pharyngeal phase, and Aspiration, with maximum 3,3,4 points were given to each phase. The total score was calculated as the final result. The final score was positively correlated with the swallowing function.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kubota water swallowing test

    Time frame: day 1 and day 20

    During the test, patients were required to drink 30 ml of warm water. According to the situation, the swallowing function was rated from Level 1 (excellent) to Level 5 (poor). Specifically, Grade 1: The patient drank all the water at once without choking; Grade II: The patient drank all the water in two or more times without choking; Grade III: The patient drank all the water at once with choking; Grade IV: The patient drank all the water in two or more times with choking; Grade V: The patient exhibited difficulty drinking with frequent choking.

  2. penetration-aspiration scale

    Time frame: day 1 and day 20

    this assessment evaluated the patient's swallowing of contrast medium and whether there was retention, penetration, and aspiration. It included multiple items, each with the corresponding criteria, Specifically, whether the swallowed material entered the airway, passed through or contacted the vocal cords, and whether the patient exhibited the corresponding ability to clear. There were 8 levels in the results, with higher levels indicating more severe aspiration.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Zeng Changhao

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Random Controlled Study to Explore the Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Pharyngeal Dysphagia After Cerebralvascular Accident

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Feb 8, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.