Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05356481

Effect of Segmental Muscle Vibration on Upper Limb Function in Post Stroke Patients

The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Muhammad shahid shabbir, Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and is often associated with persistent involvement of upper limbs.Several disturbances are the manifestation of UL impairments after stroke (i.e., muscle weakness, changes in muscle tone, joint disturbances, impaired motor control) . Muscular weakness and spasticity are most commonly observed in post stroke patients. There are many strategies are developed to improve functional status and to reduce spasticity pattern in post stroke patients. Among the different approaches to improve motor functions in post stroke patients, vibration therapy gives strong stimulatory effects in post paretic limb. Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) is a fairly new technique that has been used to improve motor function and inhibit spasticity in the hemiplegic upper extremity of patients following a stroke. In SMV, a vibratory stimulus is applied to a specific muscle tendon using a mechanical device unit.The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders
  • Age: between 50-65 years.
  • Spasticity 1-3 on MAS
  • 3-6 months post stroke patients

Exclusion criteria

  • Cardiovascular event (myocardial ischemia or infarction) occurring within 12 months,
  • Use of any antispastic drug
  • Pain from vibration
  • Inflammatory osteoarticular diseases

Treatment and study plan

segmental muscle vibration

Device

Segmental muscle vibration will delivered over the target muscles by means of vibrator with general physical therapy session

Other names: general physical therapy session

Primary outcomes

  1. Wolf Motor Functional Test

    Time frame: 10 to 15 minutes

    WMFT is valid and reliable on assessing upper extremities motor function of stroke patients. The WFMT is a tool with high interrater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and adequate stability.

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale

    Time frame: 4 to 5 minutes

    This scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity

  3. Fugl Meyer Assessment

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    Fugl Meyer Assessment

  4. Manual Muscle Testing

    Time frame: 8 to 10 minutes

    to check muscle strength

  5. • Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery • Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery

    Time frame: 5 to 10 minutes

    to check the stages of improvemnet

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison Of Segmental Vibration On Flexors and Extensor Muscle Groups On Upper Limb Function In Post-Stroke Patients

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
May 2, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.