Ankara University
Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06426667
In adults, chronic plantar fasciitis stands as the predominant cause of persistent heel discomfort.Usually, individuals depict a pulsating pain concentrated around the point of origin of the plantar fascia on the calcaneus. Numerous randomized and non-randomized studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of radiofrequency as a treatment modality for chronic plantar heel pain.In this study, our objective is to assess the impact of radiofrequency modalities applied to the posterior tibial nerve and/or the calcaneal spur area, guided by ultrasound, on patient satisfaction, pain scores, and functional improvement in individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
Chronic plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of chronic heel pain in adults. Typically, patients describe a throbbing pain localized around the origin of the plantar fascia on the calcaneus. This pain is often most severe when taking the first steps in the morning or rising after sitting. It typically improves with activity but worsens with prolonged activity. The primary aim of heel spur treatment is to alleviate pain and restore function. Surgical interventions are recommended for chronic plantar heel pain resistant to conservative options. However, surgery may be associated with prolonged recovery, and in one study, superiority over conservative treatment was not demonstrated. Radiofrequency has been shown to be an effective treatment method for chronic plantar heel pain in many randomized and non-randomized studies. In many studies, most of these procedures are applied blindly based on anatomical landmarks, with attention drawn in many studies to applications targeting the terminal branches of the posterior tibial nerve or the spur region. Only a few studies have been performed using fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. Ultrasound guidance offers several advantages over fluoroscopy and blind landmark techniques, especially in interventional procedures targeting neural and soft tissues. These advantages include the ability to visualize vascular and neural structures, very low risk of vascular-neural injury, absence of radiation exposure, and superiority in cases of anatomical variation. However, a common point in many studies related to plantar fasciitis is that applications are either directed to the spur area or to neural structures leading to the heel region. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of radiofrequency modalities applied to the posterior tibial nerve and/or calcaneal spur area under ultrasound guidance on patient satisfaction, pain scores, and patient functionality in cases of chronic plantar fasciitis (heel spur).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
pulse radiofrequency at 45 V for 300 seconds at 42 degrees Celsius is applied to the posterior tibial nerve area. During the procedure, the temperature at the electrode tip is kept below 42°C. Following negative aspiration (in the absence of blood), 2 cc of 1% lidocaine + 4 mg dexamethasone is applied to the same area.
the spur area on the calcaneal bone is identified, and sensory and motor stimulations are applied using the RF cannula. If no sensory or motor response is elicited in the area, conventional radiofrequency at 45 V for 60 seconds at 80 degrees Celsius is applied to the spur area after confirming the placement of the RF cannula.
Time frame: 1 and 3 months
pain severity change by using Numeric Rating Scala will be observed before and at 1 week, 1, 3 months after the procedure.
pain severity change by using Numeric Ratin Scala was observed 3 months after the procedure.The 11-point numerical scale ranges from '0', representing "no pain", to '10', representing extreme pain (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").
Time frame: 1 and 3 months
Patients will evaluate their satisfaction after the procedure as "satisfied", "uncertain" or "not satisfied".
Time frame: 1 and 3 months
Functionality of foot will be observed at before the procedure and 1 week, 1, 3 months after the procedure. Foot functionalliy index will be used. Foot function index consists of 23 items with 3 subgroups: pain, disability and activity limitation. To calculate the subscales and total score, the scores of each item are summed, divided by the sum of the maximum scores of the items and multiplied by 100. Higher scores indicate more pain, disability, and activity limitation. The survey score varies between 0-100, and as the score increases, the disability increases.
Time frame: 1 and 3 months
number of medication use (nonsteroidal anttinflamatort drugs, opioids, muscle relaxants) wiil be evaluated
Ankara University
Other
Effect of Radiofrequency Treatments on Foot Functionality Index, Patient Satisfaction and Pain Scores in Plantar Fasciitis Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06318910
Fasciitis, Fasciitis, Plantar
Bangkok, Changwat Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT06697834
Aponeurosis Contusion, Fasciitis
Domont, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06305507
Fasciitis, Fasciitis, Plantar
Seville, Andalusia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05925777
Fasciitis, Fasciitis, Plantar
Bari, Italy
View Trial Details