Manisa Celal Bayar University
Manisa, 45000, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06807671
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of planned visual education based on the Health Belief Model on the attitudes, beliefs, and symptoms of heart failure patients towards their disease. Planned visual education based on the Health Belief Model has positive effects on the attitudes, beliefs, and symptoms of heart failure patients towards their disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Manisa, 45000, Turkey (Türkiye)
This study, which evaluated the effects of planned visual education based on the Health Belief Model on the attitudes, beliefs, and symptoms of patients with heart failure towards their disease, was conducted with 110 heart failure patients. The study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study conducted on two groups as intervention (n = 55) and control group (n = 55). The study was conducted between September 2021 and March 2022 at Manisa Celal Bayar University (MCBU) Hafsa Sultan Hospital Cardiology Polyclinic. Simple randomization method was used in assigning the sample group to the experimental and control groups. Data were collected using "the Patient Identification Form", "the Health Belief Model Scale - Heart Failure" and "Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale - Heart Failure".
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients in the intervention group received HBM based training for a period of 6 months. During the training, one-on-one interviews were provided with each patient. Patients were shown a power point presentation, a brochure, and 3 training videos. Any questions patients had were answered one-on-one.
Other names: Educational intervention
Time frame: Pre-test
In order to monitor the effectiveness of the intervention in the study, a 6-month follow-up was conducted and data were collected from the intervention group 3 times (before the intervention, at 3 months and at 6 months) and from the control group twice (at the first interview and at 6 months) through data collection forms.
HBM-based education program was applied to the intervention group as an intervention.
Data collection tools were "Patient Information Form", "Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale - Heart Failure (MSAS-HF)" and "Health Belief Model Scale in Heart Failure (HBM-HF)".
Patient Information Form: A total of 15 questions are included, including sociodemographic information (such as age, gender, marital status, education status, employment status, occupation and income status) and additional information regarding HF/HF treatment (perceived health status, compliance with diet, exercise, treatment compliance, regular doctor visits, etc.) of the participants.
Time frame: 3 month
In the study, 3-month data were collected from the intervention group using the same measurement tools.
MSAS-HF: The scale is used to evaluate the symptoms experienced by patients with HF. It consists of three sub-dimensions in total (physical symptoms, psychological symptoms, and HF symptoms). For the symptoms encountered, it is expected to rate the frequency and severity of the symptom with a four-point Likert-type assessment, and the discomfort with a five-point Likert-type assessment. In the calculation, symptom load is first calculated for each symptom. The load of the unseen symptom is evaluated as zero. The Cronbach alpha values of the scale were reported as 0.53 for physical symptoms, 0.63 for psychological symptoms, and 0.55 for HF symptoms.
Time frame: 6-months / Post-test
In the 6th month of the study, after the educational intervention was completed, data were collected again from the intervention and control groups through data collection forms.
HBM-HF: The scale was developed to assess the attitudes and beliefs of HF patients towards their disease. The scale consists of 24 items and five sub-dimensions (perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy) and is a five-point Likert-type scale. The items of the perceived barrier sub-dimension in the scale are reverse coded. The scale does not have a total score and each sub-dimension is calculated independently. Higher scores indicate higher perception of susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and good self-efficacy, while lower scores indicate stronger perception of barriers. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the sub-dimensions are 0.91, 0.86, 0.88, 0.75, and 0.84, respectively.
Manisa Celal Bayar University
Other
Does Planned Visual Training Affect the Attitudes, Beliefs and Symptoms of Individuals with Heart Failure Towards Their Disease?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03446651
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05806606
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06847438
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07721909
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Muscat, Oman
View Trial Details