Center of Excellence for Osteoporosis Research, King Abdulaziz University
Jeddah, Mecca Region, 21589, Saudi Arabia
NCT Number: NCT01935804
The study tests whether pioglitazone (PIO)as compared to metformin (MET)affects bone health including bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and osteocyte biomarker in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Jeddah, Mecca Region, 21589, Saudi Arabia
Women with T2DM exhibit normal or higher bone mineral density (BMD) for their age, but with approximately twice the overall risk of bone fragility compared with nondiabetic subjects. Known the apparent association between T2DM and the risk of bone fragility, examining the effects of commonly used oral antidiabetic agents; such as MET and thiazolidinediones (TZDs; for example rosiglitazone [ROS] or PIO), on BMD and/or bone turnover is of great clinical relevance for both diabetic patients and their treating physicians. Recent clinical trials, showed that women treated with ROS had higher risk of bone fragility and self-reported adverse events. Similarly, women on long-term treatment with PIO for T2DM experienced higher incidence of distal extremity fractures. TZDs are agonists of the nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) which increase insulin sensitivity and improve glycemic control in T2DM. PPAR (γ) acts also as a molecular factor that favours adipogenesis over osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. The latter was suggested as a potential mechanism for the effects of TZDs on bone among others. In humans, TZDs decrease BMD and increase bone fragility risk. This study tests whether pioglitazone as compared to MET (both are commonly used in the treatment of T2DM in Saudi Arabia and other countries) affects bone health including bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and osteocyte biomarker in patients with T2DM.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
30 mg/daily for 12 months
Other names: Actos
850 mg/daily for 12 months
Other names: Glucophage
Time frame: 6-18 months
The primary endpoint was change in mean percentage change in BMD values at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by DXA from baseline and at 6 and 12 months in the PIO and the MET treatment groups.
Time frame: 6-18 months
Secondary end-points were changes in serum sclerostin, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), serum procollagen type1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and serum C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX); and urinary N-terminal crosslinking telopeptide type 1 collagen (u-NTX); serum calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), and serum Dickkopf-1( DKK-1) at various time intervals from baseline between PIO vs MET treatment.
Time frame: 6-18 months
Other endpoints were changes in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP)
Time frame: 6-18 months
lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c and triglycerides)
Time frame: 6-18 months
liver function tests [albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)]; renal function tests (creatinine, urea, uric acid) and parathyroid hormone (PTH).
Time frame: 6-18 months
within and between treatment group comparisons of change from baseline at specified time points in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin, and insulin sensitivity measured by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-s).
Time frame: 6-18 months
Safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory assessments, vital signs, and electrocardiograms
King Abdulaziz University
Other
Phase 1 Study of Pioglitazone Versus Metformin on Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes
Acronym: Pioglitazone
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05014204
Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05260021
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04809220
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT01301456
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Chula Vista, California, United States
View Trial Details