Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01935804

Effect of Pioglitazone Versus Metformin on Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes

The study tests whether pioglitazone (PIO)as compared to metformin (MET)affects bone health including bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and osteocyte biomarker in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Center of Excellence for Osteoporosis Research, King Abdulaziz University

Jeddah, Mecca Region, 21589, Saudi Arabia

About this study

Women with T2DM exhibit normal or higher bone mineral density (BMD) for their age, but with approximately twice the overall risk of bone fragility compared with nondiabetic subjects. Known the apparent association between T2DM and the risk of bone fragility, examining the effects of commonly used oral antidiabetic agents; such as MET and thiazolidinediones (TZDs; for example rosiglitazone [ROS] or PIO), on BMD and/or bone turnover is of great clinical relevance for both diabetic patients and their treating physicians. Recent clinical trials, showed that women treated with ROS had higher risk of bone fragility and self-reported adverse events. Similarly, women on long-term treatment with PIO for T2DM experienced higher incidence of distal extremity fractures. TZDs are agonists of the nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) which increase insulin sensitivity and improve glycemic control in T2DM. PPAR (γ) acts also as a molecular factor that favours adipogenesis over osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. The latter was suggested as a potential mechanism for the effects of TZDs on bone among others. In humans, TZDs decrease BMD and increase bone fragility risk. This study tests whether pioglitazone as compared to MET (both are commonly used in the treatment of T2DM in Saudi Arabia and other countries) affects bone health including bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and osteocyte biomarker in patients with T2DM.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • BMD T-score greater than -2.5 at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine;
  • No prior antidiabetic therapy;
  • Drug-naïve with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0 to ≤ 10.0%. 53.2 mmol/mol to 88.2 mmol/mol);
  • Body-mass index of 40 Kg/m2 and less;
  • Stable body weight for at least 4 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus (presence of GAD auto antibodies);
  • History of diabetes or uncontrolled hypertension;
  • Treatment with antidiabetic agents including TZDs;
  • Chronic diseases known to affect bone;
  • Previous treatment with estrogens and other medications known to affect bone ;
  • Creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min

Treatment and study plan

pioglitazone

Drug

30 mg/daily for 12 months

Other names: Actos

metformin

Drug

850 mg/daily for 12 months

Other names: Glucophage

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in mean percentage change in BMD at various sites by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) from baseline and at 6, 12 months in PIO versus MET treatment group.

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    The primary endpoint was change in mean percentage change in BMD values at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by DXA from baseline and at 6 and 12 months in the PIO and the MET treatment groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bone turnover Markers and other Biomarkers

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    Secondary end-points were changes in serum sclerostin, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), serum procollagen type1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and serum C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX); and urinary N-terminal crosslinking telopeptide type 1 collagen (u-NTX); serum calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), and serum Dickkopf-1( DKK-1) at various time intervals from baseline between PIO vs MET treatment.

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory and Safety Outcomes

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    Other endpoints were changes in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP)

  2. Exploratory Outcomes: lipid profile

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL-c, LDL-c and triglycerides)

  3. Exploratory outcomes: liver and renal function tests

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    liver function tests [albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP)]; renal function tests (creatinine, urea, uric acid) and parathyroid hormone (PTH).

  4. Exploratory outcomes: glycemic control

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    within and between treatment group comparisons of change from baseline at specified time points in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin, and insulin sensitivity measured by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-s).

  5. Exploratory and safety outcomes

    Time frame: 6-18 months

    Safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory assessments, vital signs, and electrocardiograms

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King Abdulaziz University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Phase 1 Study of Pioglitazone Versus Metformin on Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes

Acronym: Pioglitazone

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Sep 5, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 17, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.