Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05042284

Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity. Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer.

Neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion starts, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception begins that results in pain. Blockade of the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (~25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases.

This led to the investigators' hypothesis that negative feedback of CCK by non enteric coated pancreatic enzymes could ameliorate pain in a more effective manner by NE-PERT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500082, India

About this study

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas characterized by progressive and irreversible damage. It manifests with abdominal pain and/or exocrine or endocrine insufficiency. Recurrent abdominal pain is the dominant clinical hallmark that mandates aggressive management. Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity.

Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer.

It has been postulated that neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion from the pancreas begins, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception is initiated that results in pain. On this premise, the investigators hypothesized that blocking the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain.

Earlier meta-analyses that evaluated the effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation on pain reported that there were no overall benefits in pain management. All but two of those studies used enteric coated enzyme. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (~25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases. However, on subgroup analyses in the aforementioned meta-analyses, pain reduction was observed in the two studies that used non-enteric coated preparations. These studies were done several years earlier, had a small sample size, and had a cross over design. This formed that rationale of the investigators' current study to test the hypothesis using a statistically valid design with a higher sample size that would allow subgroup analyses, adjust for alternative pain mechanisms, and achieve a better effect size.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic pancreatitis of at least 3 years
  • At least 3 episodes of pain in the past 3 months
  • Pain score of at least 3 on VAS (0-10)
  • Age 18-60yrs
  • Both genders

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute pancreatitis episode at the time of enrolment.
  • Pancreatic cancer.
  • Other chronic painful conditions.
  • Active substance use (alcohol, smoking, smokeless tobacco, illicit drugs).
  • Pregnancy and lactation.
  • Inability to give informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation

Drug

The patients will be given a non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsule containing 30000 U of protease thrice daily along with meals for 3 months.

Other names: Placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain score 1

    Time frame: 3 months

    Visual analogue score will be used. Score ranges from 0-10, 10 indicating most severe.

  2. Change in pain score 2

    Time frame: 3 months

    Izbicki pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in pain score 1

    Time frame: 6 months

    Visual analogue score will be used. Score ranges from 0-10, 10 indicating most severe.

  2. Change in pain score 2

    Time frame: 6 months

    Izbicki pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.

  3. Change in number of painful days

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of days when the patient experienced pain

  4. Change in number of painful days

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of days when the patient experienced pain

  5. Change in quality of life

    Time frame: 3 months

    Will be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.

  6. Change in quality of life

    Time frame: 6 months

    Will be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.

  7. Change in analgesic requirement

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of analgesic tablets required will be recorded

  8. Change in analgesic requirement

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of analgesic tablets required will be recorded

  9. Change in the number of hospitalization

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded

  10. Change in the number of hospitalization

    Time frame: 6 months

    Number of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [First follow-up]

    Time frame: 3 months

    Pin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum)

  2. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [Second follow-up]

    Time frame: 6 months

    Pin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum);

  3. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [First follow-up]

    Time frame: 3 months

    Cold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)

  4. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [Second follow-up]

    Time frame: 6 months

    Cold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)

  5. Change in pain DETECT score [First follow-up]

    Time frame: 3 months

    The painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.

  6. Change in pain DETECT score [Second follow-up]

    Time frame: 6 months

    The painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: a Double -Blinded Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial (NE-PERT Trial)

Acronym: NE-PERT

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Sep 13, 2021
Registry last updated
Sep 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.