Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02837848

Effect of Muscle Coactivation Strengthening for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) is the most frequent cause of shoulder pain. RCT is frequently termed as impingement syndrome, based on the underlying mechanism in which the subacromial space soft tissues (subacromial bursa, rotator cuff tendons and long head of the biceps tendon) get encroached under the coracoacromial arch when the arm is elevated. RCT contributes in the decrease in quality of life and function, and in inducing work incapacities and sleep disorders.

Exercises, as conservative management, were shown to be effective in increasing function and in decreasing pain related to RCT. However, the lack of studies comparing different types of exercises (i.e. concentric, eccentric, scapular strengthening, proprioceptive, coactivation) is reported by many systematic reviews. One type of exercise, coactivation strengthening, could be more efficient. Coactivation strengthening implies a recruitment of the pectoralis major and the latissimus dorsi while performing regular strengthening. When theses muscles are recruited, the medio-inferior orientation of their tendons creates a force vector that limits the superior translation of the humeral head, thus limits the subacromial narrowing.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of coactivation strengthening exercises in patient with RCT compared to regular strengthening exercises. Forty-two participants diagnosed with RCT by an orthopaedic surgeon following a standardized protocol will be randomised to either coactivation or regular strengthening exercises. Participants will perform a 6-week exercise protocols. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, and at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome is function assessed with the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes focus on pain (visual analog scale), quality of life (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index), impression of change (Patient Global Impression of Change), subacromial distance (ultrasonography) and muscular strength (manual dynamometer). Investigators expect that coactivation strengthening exercises will be more efficient over the short and long term.

This trial will provide data to guide clinicians in the treatment of RCT to reduce recovery time and to bring patients back as quickly as possible to work or usual function.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre de Recherche du CHUS

Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-65 years old
  • Experienced shoulder pain > four weeks
  • Positive Painful Arc Test
  • Positive Neer or Hawkins Kennedy test
  • Pain at resisted isometric movement of abduction or external rotation

Exclusion criteria

  • Any other shoulder pathology
  • Rotator cuff complete tear
  • History of shoulder surgery
  • Any systemic inflammation or neurological condition
  • Received a corticosteroid injection < six weeks
  • Any known cognitive condition

Treatment and study plan

Coactivation Strengthening

Procedure

Coactivation strengthening implies a recruitment of the pectoralis major and the latissimus dorsi while performing regular strengthening.

Regular Strengthening

Procedure

Regular strengthening implies external rotation, internal rotation, flexion and abduction of the gleno-humeral joint and scapular protraction and retraction of the scapulothoracic joint strengthening.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in function (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire - DASH)

    Time frame: Baseline - six weeks

    DASH is a self-reported questionnaire of 30 items measuring physical disability and symptoms. (St-Pierre et al., 2015; Roy et al., 2009)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in function (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire - DASH)

    Time frame: Baseline - three, 12, 18 and 24 weeks

    DASH is a self-reported questionnaire of 30 items measuring physical disability and symptoms. (St-Pierre et al., 2015; Roy et al., 2009)

  2. Change in pain (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS)

    Time frame: Baseline - three, six, 12, 18 and 24 weeks

    VAS is a self-reported scale of 10 cm measuring the intensity of pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 cm (worst pain). (Dworkin et al., 2008)

  3. Change in quality of life/Function (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index - WORC)

    Time frame: Baseline - three, six, 12, 18 and 24 weeks

    WORC index is a disease-specific questionnaire developed to measure health related quality-of-life of individuals suffering from RC disorders. It contains 21 items divided into five sections: physical symptoms, sports/recreation, work, lifestyle and emotions. (Ekeberg et al., 2010)

  4. Impression of Change (Patient Global Impression of Change - PGIC)

    Time frame: at three, six, 12, 18 and 24 weeks

    PGIC is a single-item rating by participants of their response during a clinical trial using a seven-points rating scale between "Very much worst" and "Very much improved". (Dworkin et al., 2008)

  5. Change in subacromial distance (ultrasound scanner)

    Time frame: Baseline - six weeks

    Subacromial distance is defined as the tangential distance between the upper part of the humeral head and the lower part of the acromion. Ultrasound Imaging will be performed with a 6-13 Hz linear array probe (Sonosite Turbo, Futjifilm). (Desmeules et al., 2004)

  6. Isometric strength (manual dynamometer)

    Time frame: Baseline - six weeks

    The isometric strength of flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation movements will be perform with a MicroFET manual dynamometer (Hoggan Health Industries, USA).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Université de Sherbrooke

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Adding Muscle Coactivation to Regular Shoulder Strengthening Exercises on Function and Pain With Patients Suffering of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: coacticuff

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 20, 2016
Registry last updated
May 6, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.