Future University in Egypt
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05647720
There is a scarcity in literature regarding the influence of maxillary third molar on distalization . This study aimed to compare the influence of unerupted maxillary third molars and their extraction on the bilateral distalization of upper first molars using the infra-zygomatic gear distalizer
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–19 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Maxillary molar distalization is one of the non-extraction modalities for treating class II malocclusion. When distalizing maxillary molars In adults, it is not a problem to extract fully erupted third molars, and it may even be suggested that the extraction site may accommodate distalization. On the contrary, adolescents usually have unerupted third molars with partially formed roots, rendering the surgical extraction more difficult and traumatic. The necessity of surgically extracting upper third molar buds before distalization remains questionable. Therefore, this study was conducted to three-dimensionally assess the impact of maxillary third molar presence on distalizing maxillary molars in adolescent patients having Class II malocclusion.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After surgical extraction of unerupted upper third molars, the maxillary first molars were distalized using a labial bow with two soldered crimpable hooks distal to the upper lateral incisors. The labial bow fitted in the flying tube of the upper first molar bands. It was anchored bilaterally to the infra-zygomatic mini-implant by closed coil spring that applied a force of 300gm on each side
The maxillary first molars were distalized , without extracting upper third molars, using a labial bow with two soldered crimpable hooks distal to the upper lateral incisors. The labial bow fitted in the flying tube of the upper first molar bands. It was anchored bilaterally to the infra-zygomatic mini-implant by closed coil spring that applied a force of 300gm on each side
Time frame: From pre to post distalization (an average of 8 months)
Anteroposterior changes in the position of maxillary first molars assessed on digitized models and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes(measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Incremental changes in the antero-posterior position of maxillary first molars assessed on digitized models taken for each patient before and after distalization and in each follow up visit. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Angular changes of maxillary first molar assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes(measurement of the angles in degrees).
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
vertical positional changes of maxillary first molar assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Changes in the transvers distance between the right and left upper first molars assessed on digitized models taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Study models that are taken pre and post retraction (then digitalized) will be used to assess the rotation of the maxillary first molars in relation to a reference line (measurement of the angles in degrees)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Angular changes of maxillary second molar assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes. (measured in of in degrees)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Angular changes of maxillary third molar assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measurement of the angles in degrees)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Vertical positional changes of maxillary third molar assessed on cone beam computed (measured in mm)tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks
, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Vertical positional changes of upper incisors assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Antero-posterior change in the anteroposterior position of upper incisors assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Angular changes of upper incisors assessed on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measurement of the angles in degrees)
Time frame: From pre- to post-distalization (an average of 8 months)
Antero-posterior change in the position of maxillary first and second premolars assessed on digitized models taken for each patient before and after distalization. Measurements were done by identifying landmarks, reference lines, and planes (measured in mm)
Future University in Egypt
Other
Effect of Maxillary Third Molar Extraction vs Non-extraction on Distalization of First Molars in a Group of Adolescent Patients Using Infra-Zygomatic Gear Distalizer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07454694
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07390357
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Wschowa, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05227859
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Damascus, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT06832475
Class II Malocclusion, IMPA Angle
Rome, Italy
View Trial Details