Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06201286

Effect of Manual Therapy on Obese Individuals With Low Back Pain

This study will investigate the effectiveness of Mulligan mobilisation techniques Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) and Natural Apophyseal Glides (NAGs) on pain, disability, and range of motion (ROM) in obese individuals with mechanical low back pain (LBP).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Health Sciences Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University

Bolu, 14300, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

One of the most important methods in the treatment of LBP in recent years is manual therapy; manipulation, mobilisation and soft tissue techniques. With the manual techniques applied to the spine, the position and placement of the anatomical structures are changed and the tight and tense tissues are loosened. It has been observed that Mulligan techniques can correct the faults that cause pain in the spine and that the structures that cause pain return to their normal functions when released. In the literature, it has recently been observed that the number of studies examining manual therapy and Mulligan Concept methods has increased. Studies examining the effect of SNAG method on the lumbar region (12) and the effect of mobilisation and taping on chronic low back pain were found. However, no study was found in which SNAG and NAGS applications were applied on obese patients diagnosed with mechanical low back pain. Therefore, in this study, SNAG and NAGS in obese patients with LBP to investigate the effectiveness of the practices

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

diagnosed with mechanical low back pain, Body Mass Index (BMI) was between 30.00-39.99, 1.-2. Forty-six patients, aged 20-50 years, who were extremely obese and had pain radiating to the lower back and hips for at least 3 months,

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

Mulligan Concept

Other

Mulligan Concept was applied by the physiotherapist who received A-B module trainings. Mulligan techniques were performed with 3 sets of 10 repetitions and 15-20 seconds rest between sets. Mobilisations were applied to the spinous process of each vertebra of the lumbar region with 3 sets of 10 repetitions of SNAG and 3 sets of 10 repetitions of NAGS techniques. In the standing position, the physiotherapist took a position next to the patient and stabilised the patient by grasping the abdomen with one arm.

Strengthening exercises were applied to the rectus abdominis, internal and external obliquus, transversus abdominis muscles from flexor muscle groups in 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Stretching exercises were applied to the erector spinae and intertransversarii lumborum muscles from extensor muscle groups as 3 sets of 10 repetitions for 15-30 seconds.

stretching and strengthening exercises

Other

Strengthening exercises were applied to the rectus abdominis, internal and external obliquus, transversus abdominis muscles from flexor muscle groups in 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Stretching exercises were applied to the erector spinae and intertransversarii lumborum muscles from extensor muscle groups as 3 sets of 10 repetitions for 15-30 seconds.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Assessment

    Time frame: Two times in 11 day (before intervention, immediately after last intervention)

    Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of mechanical neck pain. Individuals were asked to mark the pain they felt on a 10 cm long VAS scale ("0" indicates no pain and "10" indicates unbearable pain).

  2. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

    Time frame: Two times in 11 day (before intervention, immediately after last intervention)

    Evaluate back disability status a questionnaire consisting of 10 items. The items measure the severity of pain, self-care, lifting and carrying, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, travelling and the degree of change in pain, respectively. Under each item, the patient was asked six statements to be marked. The first statement is scored as "0" and the sixth statement is scored as "5". The higher the score, the higher the level of disability.

  3. Joint Range of Motion Assessment (ROM)

    Time frame: Two times in 11 day (before intervention, immediately after last intervention)

    Active flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion and rotation of the cervical region were measured in the sitting position with a phone goniometer application.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Abant Izzet Baysal University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pain, Function and Range of Motion Related Outcomes of Mulligan Concept Applications in Obese Individuals With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 11, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.