University of Leeds
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04240795
The main aim of the study is to elucidate the influence of fibre-based hydrogels differing in their mechanical properties (characterized both instrumentally and sensorially) in terms of low/ high lubricity on satiety, satiation and salivary biomarkers.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
An acute, randomized cross-over study that compares two types of fibre-based hydrogels differing in their lubrication properties, resulting in different pastiness and instrumental mechanical properties (lubricity). The gels are prepared using dietary fibres (kappa carrageenan, alginate). Both hydrogels contain added watermelon flavor, food grade color and sweetener. Water acts as a control and has the same flavor, color and sweetness to match the hydrogels.
Participants are asked come to the laboratory on three occasions. Before participating, each participant is screened for eligibility criteria using an online health screening questionnaire and Three Factors Eating Questionnaire. Participants are offered one of the three products (water or either of the two gels), the order of which is randomized and counterbalanced.
Participants are instructed to fast for 11 hours and to restrict from drinking alcohol for 24 hours before each session. In the first session, weight and height are measured. Participants then provide baseline (- 5 minutes) appetite ratings on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). After that they are given a standardized breakfast (females - 250kcal, males - 350 kcal). Then, participants are asked to rate their appetite on a 100-mm VAS in every 30 minutes for the next 2.5 hours. After that, they are given the preload - either hydrogels differing in their structure complexity or water. After consuming the preload, appetite ratings are recorded by the participants on three time points on 100-mm VAS. Ad libitum food is offered as lunch after 30 minutes after ingesting the preload and the last VAS is taken. Food intake is measured. Saliva is taken three times during each session after breakfast, before and after preload consumption to measure protein, mucin content, amylase activity, and salivary lubricity (tribology).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The preload is made from kappa-carrageenan and alginate beads of 450 μm size. It contains no additional macronutrient but has food-grade watermelon flavor, color, and non-nutritive sweetener.
Other names: High lubricity (HL) hydrogels containing no fibre-based beads, Water
Time frame: -5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
A questionnaire assessing perceived hunger is completed at specific times points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks : "How hungry do you feel right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min hunger) and 100 is (max hunger).
Time frame: -5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
A questionnaire assessing perceived fullness is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How full do you feel right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min fullness) and 100 is (max fullness).
Time frame: -5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
A questionnaire assessing perceived desire to eat is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How strong is your desire to eat right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min desire to eat) and 100 is (max desire to eat)
Time frame: -5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
A questionnaire assessing perceived prospective food consumption is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How much food do you think you could eat right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min prospective food consumption) and 100 is (max prospective food consumption).
Time frame: -5 minutes, 0 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 160 minutes, 170 minutes, 180 minutes, 190 minutes, 225 minutes
A questionnaire assessing perceived thirst is completed at specific time points throughout each of the 3.5-hours testing days. The questionnaire is a 100 mm VAS representing a horizontal line rating scale for each response. It asks: "How thirsty do you feel right now?" with anchors of "not all" to "extremely." The range is 0 mm (min thirst) and 100 is (max thirst).
Time frame: 20 minutes after the preload
The participants are provided with an ad libitum lunch of rice and vegetables, strawberry yogurt water. The amount of lunch is provided (in grams) and is weighted prior to consumption and any remains are re-weighted after consumption. Energy consumed will be calculated.
Time frame: 90 minutes, 150 minutes, 170 minutes
Saliva is collected on three time points on each visit. Salivary protein, amylase, mucin and statherin will be analysed and salivary lubricity will be mesaured
Time frame: Immediately after eating the preload
The palatability of both the hydrogels and water are assessed through a 100 mm VAS scale. Within the palatability the ratings are taking on following attributes: the texture, flavor and sweetness. The questions asked are: "How much did you like the texture of the product you have just eaten?", "How much did you like the flavor of the product you have just eaten?", How intense was the sweet taste of the product you have just eaten?" with anchors from "not at all" to "extremely".
University of Leeds
Other
The Effects of Hydrogels Differing in Their Lubricity on Appetite Control, Satiety, Subsequent Food Intake and Salivary Biomarkers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06327087
Appetitive Behavior, Behavior
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06327464
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06015490
Appetitive Behavior, Behavior
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05725681
Appetitive Behavior, Behavior
Lubbock, Texas, United States
View Trial Details