Cantonment General Hospital, Saddar
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46060, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT06584708
To compare the effect of low volume high intensity training and moderate intensity continuous exercise on Rate Pressure Product (RPP) and functional capacity. Limited literature available on effectiveness of Low-volume HIIT in comparison of other Aerobic interventions in obese individuals. In our community, people are sedentary and not involved in routine exercise because of increased weight, so Low volume HIIT would be safe and convenient for such individuals to perform. There is also limited studies available on female gender so both genders are included in this study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46060, Pakistan
Some recent studies suggest that the rising interest for the potential of high- intensity interval training (HIIT) to enhance the metabolic health in overweight adults. HIIT has also been found to induce comparatively fast enhancements in overall-body aerobic capacity and muscle mitochondrial markers in individuals with overweight.
The main advantage of HIIT is that low-volume HIIT protocols can involve a shorter time as compared with MICT, and time limitations have been recognized as a generally reported hurdle to daily exercise involvement.
Latest studies propose that's when compared to moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), HIIT has been shown to produce similar and sometimes better improvements in results such as cardiorespiratory fitness in spite of often demanding a smaller amount of time commitment and lesser energy expenditure. On the other hand, low volume HIIT is still undecided whether this form of physical training is superior, equivalent or inferior to more outdated forms of exercise training such as MICT for the management cardio metabolic health.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Week 1 & 2:
Warm-up: 10 minutes at 50% THR Work: 1x4 minutes at 80% THR followed by 1*4 minutes Recovery at 50% THR Cool down: 5 minutes at 50% THR Total exercise time: 23 minutes
Week 3 & 4:
Warm-up: 10 minutes at 50% THR Work: 2x6 minutes at 80% THR followed by 1*6 minutes Recovery at 50% THR Cool down: 5 minutes at 50% THR Total exercise time: 33 minutes
Week 1 & 2:
Warm-up: 5 minutes at 50% THR Work: 20 minutes at 60% VO 2 THR Cool Down: 5 minutes at 50% THR Total exercise time: 30 minutes
Week 3 & 4:
Warm-up: 5 minutes at 50% THR Work: 30 minutes at 60% THR Cool Down: 5 minutes at 50% THR Total exercise time: 40 minutes
Time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the intervention, measured through product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure, is a very reliable indicator of myocardial oxygen demand. An RPP above 20,000 mmHg per minute is considered healthy, whereas anything below 16,000 mmHg is considered insufficient.
Time frame: 2 Weeks, 4 Weeks
Changes from baseline to 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the intervention, measured through 6 min walk test (6 MWT). It is a submaximal exercise test that can aid in assessing the functional/exercise capacity of patients with cardiopulmonary diseases, in this test we find out the maximum distance in meters that an individual covers in 6 min without any support.
Riphah International University
Other
Effect of Low-Volume High-Intensity Training vs. Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise on Rate Pressure Product and Functional Capacity in Individuals With Increased BMI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02075710
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07717814
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Anaheim, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07313761
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Anaheim, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05330247
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Copenhagen, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
View Trial Details