School of Dentistry ,Department of Periodontics,The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT01522131
Purpose: The proposed study will evaluate and compare the clinical response of using bioresorbable collagen membrane alone or defect debridement with erbium Laser irradiation in conjunction with bioresorbable collagen membrane in the treatment of Class II furcation defects in maxillary and mandibular teeth. The study will examine whether there is a superior regeneration potential when the laser energy is combined with membrane defect isolation.
Procedure: The study will use 2 groups, a control group and a test group with 16 patients in each group, with severe chronic periodontitis having clinical or radiographic evidence of Class II furcation defects in the buccal or lingual of the mandibular molars or Class II furcation defects on the buccal of maxillary molars. 16 patients will serve as the control group and open flap debridement with bioresorbable collagen membrane will be the mode of treatment. Group 2: 16 patients will serve as the test group and will undergo open flap debridement in conjunction with Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation and a bioresorbable collagen membrane will be used.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
All subjects will be patients of record in the Graduate Periodontics clinic at the UT School of Dentistry. These individuals will have already been diagnosed with chronic periodontitis and require surgical intervention to treat the disease process. All patients will have received initial periodontal therapy consisting of oral hygiene instructions and scaling and root planing. Once enrolled in the study, all subjects will receive surgical therapy involving opened flap debridement of the affected furcation defects along with membrane isolation of the defect. The test group will have debridement performed with the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and ultrasonic cleansing, while the control group will have hand instrumentation along with ultrasonic cleansing. This procedure will take approximately 1.5 hours. Postoperative appointments at 1,2,4,8 weeks requiring 15-30 minutes per appointment; at 3 months for periodontal maintenance and reinforcement of home care requiring 45 minutes; and at 6 months for periodontal maintenance, reassessment of the furcation defect and correction of residual defects requiring 75 minutes. Patients will be exited from the study 2 weeks after the last maintenance appointment and placed on recall with the Department of Periodontics dental hygienist. The total time commitment for each patient is 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
bioresorbable membrane with laser will be used for regeneration of the periodontium(test)
Time frame: At Baseline and 6 months
Patients with periodontitis lose bone and clinical attachment over a period of time. In both control and test a Nabers probe( curved probe) marked in mm was used to quantify this loss or gain of clinical attachment in a horizontal direction from the cemento-enamel junction to the the most apical extent of the bone at the furcation entrance at baseline and after 6months after the procedure. These measurements were done intrasurgery and before opening of the flaps,again both at initial visit and 6 months after the procedure was done. This measurement will be measured in mm in postive numbers and then will be compared to measurements ( in mm) at intial and baseline. If there is a loss in attachment it will be denoted by negative number. If theres a gain in attachment it will be denoted by a positive number after the comparison.
Time frame: At Baseline and 6 months
Patients with periodontitis lose bone and clinical attachment over a period of time in vertical direction also. In both control and test a UNC probe marked in mm was used to quantify this loss or gain of clinical attachment in a vertical direction from the cemento-enamel junction to the most apical extent of the bone at the furcation entrance at baseline and after 6months after the procedure. These measurements were done intrasurgery and before opening of the flaps,again both at initial visit and 6 months after the procedure was done.This measurement will be measured in mm in postive numbers and then will be compared to measurements ( in mm) at intial and baseline. Increase and decrease of vertical probing depth will be noted by a positive number.
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Other
Treatment of Class II Furcation Defects in the Maxillary and Mandibular Molars With Bioresorbable Collagen Membrane and Laser
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05237401
Furcation Defects, Mouth Diseases
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06270303
Furcation Defects, Mouth Diseases
Gothenburg, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06757660
Furcation Defects, Mouth Diseases
Minya, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07042204
Furcation Defects, Mouth Diseases
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial Details