Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06586463

Effect Of Kinetic Control Training On Pain And Craniovertebral Angle In Symptomatic Forward Head Posture

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effect of adding kinetic control training of cervical and shoulder joints on pain, neck function, neuromuscular control of the deep cervical flexors, and craniovertebral angle in symptomatic forward head posture.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Symptomatic Forwardhead Posture

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

About this study

Forward head posture (FHP) is one of the most common postural deformity, which affects 66% of the patient population with high prevalence among university students due to prolonged usage of computer, smartphones and faulty posture during lectures with lack of awareness about proper posture among them.Participants with FHP exhibited abnormal sensorimotor control and autonomic nervous system dysfunction compared to those with normal head alignment .

Identifying and classifying movement faults is fast becoming the key of recent neuromusculoskeletal rehabilitation. Uncontrolled movement (UCM), contributing to neck pain symptoms, can cause compression or impingement on one side of joints while developing tensile strain on the other side. If UCM is not managed, and the related tissue stress and strain are sustained or repeated beyond the limits of tissue tolerance, multiple tissue pathology may develop eventually and a combination of symptoms may occur . As seen in symptomatic forward head posture.

Along with the identification of site and direction of the faults, direction-movement control intervention(kinetic control) retrains the control of the movement faults. The suggestion is that uncontrolled movement links to the pattern of movement during everyday activities and relates to neck pain. This maneuver can reduce symptoms of neck pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

1) 50 Subjects of both genders aged 18-40 years old with symptomatic forward head posture (FHP) and Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2 .

Subjects have FHP if CVA ≤ 50° for assessing FHP 3) Pain between three and eight using numerical pain rating scale NPRS 4) Subjects have non-specific neck pain for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

The patients were excluded if they had:

Experienced a history of neck injuries, neck and shoulder surgery
Shoulder trauma, tendinitis, thoracic surgery
Neurological disorders such as cervical spondylosis, spondylolisthesis.
Disc prolapse
Rheumatic disease, fibromyalgia

Treatment and study plan

kinitic control training

Other

kinetic control training, Correction of Low cervical flexion UCM Initially, position the lower and upper cervical spine in neutral with the head supported. the person is trained to perform independent upper cervical flexion (nodding). The upper cervical spine can flex only so far as there is no low cervical flexion. As the ability to control upper cervical extension gets easier and the pattern of dissociation feels less unnatural the exercise can be progressed.

Correction of scapula and glenohumeral ( UCM) the arm flexion is performed unsupported through the partial range that can be controlled well. This is eventually progressed throughout the full benchmark range with the elbow straight. With visual, auditory and kinaesthetic cues the person becomes familiar with the task of flexing the glenohumeral joint to 90° without scapula movement or glenohumeral translation.

Other names: conventional treatment

Primary outcomes

craniovertebral angle

Time frame: up to 4 weeks
- CVA is defined as the angle formed between a horizontal line through the spinous process of C7 and a line from the tragus of the ear.• To calculate the CVA, reflective markers will be put on the tragus of the ear and the spinous process of C7 before photographing.The eye level will be established by asking the subjects to look forward at a point directly in front of them (colored label will be put on the wall in front of them at their eye level) .
- A Phone camera will be fixed on an adjustable tripod 1.5 m away from the subject and its base was set at the height of the participant's shoulder. Landmark will be placed on the floor to ensure the same positon of the participants and constant distance from the camera
- The subjects will be asked to stand comfortably in a normal standing position with their hands hanging beside their bodies and a lateral view picture will be taken from the dominant side by a phone camera. The photos will be analyzed by Kinovea software

Secondary outcomes

neck pain

Time frame: up to 4weeks

neck pain by Numerical pain rating scale NPRS . It is a horizontal line with graduation of numbers on it (0-10) 0 means no pain, 10 means the most severe pain that the patient can not tolerate.
neck function

Time frame: up to 4 weeks

Neck disability index (Arabic version):

Assessment of neck function will be performed by Arabic neck disability index. It is a valid and reliable tool in the assessment of neck function . It contains 10 categories. Each category contains six choices (0-5). Score from 0-4 no disability, from 5-15 this is mild, from 15-24 this is moderate, from 25-34 this is severe, more than 34 this is a complete disability
neuromuscular control of the deep cervical flexors (activation and endurance)

Time frame: up to 4 weeks

Cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT): to evaluate neuromuscular control of the deep cervical flexors (activation and endurance) The patient was supine, the head and neck were in a neutral position. The space between the cervical lordotic curve and the table was filled with a pneumatic PBU inflated to 20 mmHg (below the suboccipital region, not below the lower cervical area). The patient performed CCF movement in a graduated approach in 5 increments (22, 24, 26, 28, 30 mmHg), (22, 24, 26, 28, 30 mmHg) that the subject could hold steadily for 10 s using the correct CCF action. Secondly, the assessor evaluated the number of repetitions of a 10 s hold that the patient could perform at their target level. Performance on the CCFT was scored as the pressure level that the patient was able to achieve (activation score) multiplied by the number of repetitions they could perform.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Noura metwally khalifa, master

CONTACT

[email protected]

002 01016209561 ext. egypt

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Other

Registry information

Acronym: CairoU

Important dates

Study start: 2024
Primary completion: 2025
Study completion: 2025
First posted: Sep 19, 2024
Registry last updated: Sep 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.