Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03117491

Effect of Inferior Alveolar and Gow-Gates Nerve Block Techniques for Symptomatic Mandibular Molars

Introduction: to evaluate the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), Gow-Gates nerve block (GGNB), and their combination in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Methods: One hundred fifty subjects with irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular molar were selected. subjects randomly received two IANB injections or two GGNB injections or their combination of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Success was specified as no or mild pain on the basis of Heft-Parker visual analogue scale recordings up on the access cavity preparation or initial instrumentation. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, and ANOVA tests.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Isfahan, Iran

About this study

Introduction: to evaluate the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), Gow-Gates nerve block (GGNB), and their combination in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Methods: One hundred fifty subjects with irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular molar were selected. subjects randomly received two IANB injections or two GGNB injections or their combination of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Success was specified as no or mild pain on the basis of Heft-Parker visual analogue scale recordings up on the access cavity preparation or initial instrumentation. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, and ANOVA tests.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • vital mandibular molar tooth
  • diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Exclusion criteria

  • younger than 18 years old
  • history of significant medical conditions
  • allergies to local anesthetics or sulfites
  • pregnancy
  • taking any medications that might influence anesthetic assessment
  • active sites of pathosis in area of injection
  • inability to give informed consent

Treatment and study plan

GGNB injections

Procedure

The patients received two GGNB injections of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

IANB injections

Procedure

The patients received two IANB injections of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

GGNB + IANB injections

Procedure

The patients received one GGNB injection plus one IANB injection of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine

Primary outcomes

  1. the success rate of GGNB local anesthesia technique based on Heft-Parker visual analog scale

    Time frame: at time of access cavity preparation

  2. the success rate of IANB local anesthesia technique based on Heft-Parker visual analog scale

    Time frame: at time of access cavity preparation

  3. the success rate of GGNB + IANB local anesthesia techniques based on Heft-Parker visual analog scale

    Time frame: at time of access cavity preparation

Secondary outcomes

  1. initial pain based on Heft-Parker visual analog scale

    Time frame: before treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 18, 2017
Registry last updated
May 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.