Cairo university
Cairo, 12611, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05613075
Many dentists, clinicians and researchers have conducted numerous trials, and put several materials and procedures under the test, in an attempt to preserve vertical and/or horizontal extraction sockets dimensions. The clinical consequences of post-extraction remodeling may affect the outcome of the ensuing therapies aimed at restoring the lost dentition, either by limiting the bone availability for ideal implant placement or by compromising the aesthetic result of the prosthetic restorations. In an attempt for ridge/socket preservation of a freshly extracted tooth socket/bed, this study aims to assess and compare between using autogenous tooth graft added with Hyaluronic acid, and the usage of the standardized autogenous tooth graft alone, regarding the potency, preservative feature, and quality of bone healing, density, and deposition. For a better restorative outcome using a delayed implant placement later on in the edentulous area.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 12611, Egypt
The available studies provide insufficient information to assess the efficacy of the usage of ha after tooth extraction in order to induce wound healing and accelerates bone deposition and differentiation. Hence, the purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate whether there is any beneficial value of local administration of 8% ha gel formulation (gengigel ®; farmalink saglik, istanbul, turkey) on the postoperative healing phase, bone density and ridge dimensions.
In an attempt for ridge/socket preservation of a freshly extracted tooth socket/bed, this study aims to assess and compare between using autogenous tooth graft added with Hyaluronic acid, and the usage of the standardized autogenous tooth graft alone, regarding the potency, preservative feature, and quality of bone healing, density, and deposition. For a better restorative outcome using a delayed implant placement later on in the e-dentulous area.
Our null hypothesis that post-extraction ridges preserved with Hyaluronic acid mixed with autogenous tooth grafts will present no significant higher bone density at extraction site, nor better dimensional preservation of the ridge tooth/teeth socket(s), vertically and/or horizontally, than the normalized/standardized ridge preservation using autogenous tooth graft particulates alone, carried to serve delayed implants placement later on, at extraction sites.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft
tooth extraction and socket preservation with demineralized tooth graft with hyaluronic acid
Time frame: 6 months
Bucco-lingual alveolar ridge width
Time frame: 6 months
Height of Buccal ridge
Time frame: 6 months
height of Lingual ridge
Time frame: 6 months
percentage of newly formed lamellar bone bundles and/or newly formed bone trabeculae
Time frame: 2 weeks
percentage of complete post operative wound closure by soft tissues
Time frame: 6 months
percentage of residual bone graft particles
Time frame: 2 weeks
Patient's pain and discomfort, 0-10 score, 0 represents "no pain", 10 represents "as bad as possible"
Cairo University
Other
Potential Effect Assessment of Locally Applied Hyaluronic Acid, When Mixed With Autogenous De-mineralized Tooth Graft, for Socket Preservation, in Comparison With the Application of Autogenous De-mineralized Tooth Graft Alone.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06424223
Alveolar Bone Loss, Alveolar Bone Resorption
Bari, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07404098
Alveolar Bone Resorption, Nano-hydroxyapatite
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07584629
Alveolar Bone Resorption
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05902689
Alveolar Bone Resorption
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial Details