Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06494410

Effect of High Versus Low Fraction of Inspired Oxygen During Alveolar Recruitment

Intraoperative absorption atelectasis is associated with decreased lung compliance, impaired oxygenation, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and lung injury.

The alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) with positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been advocated as efficient for absorption atelectasis treatment.

During general anesthesia, absorption atelectasis reportedly occurs in most patients especially during laparoscopic surgery, the increased abdominal pressure of capnoperitoneum may shift the diaphragm cranially and decrease respiratory compliance

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ain Shams University Hospitals

Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt

About this study

The incidence of obesity (defined by a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2) is increasing worldwide. In selected individuals, bariatric surgery may offer means of achieving long-term weight loss, improved health, and healthcare cost reduction. Physiological changes that occur because of obesity and general anesthesia predispose to respiratory complications following bariatric surgery.

Obesity affects many respiratory functions, including, among others, a reduction in functional residual capacity, an increase in airway resistance, and a high level of ventilation-perfusion mismatch. The combination of obesity and postoperative respiratory muscle dysfunction could promote respiratory failure.

Absorption atelectasis occurs in most patients, typically due to absorption of gas, compression of the lung tissue, and impairment of surfactant function. Additionally, during laparoscopic surgery, the increased abdominal pressure of capnoperitoneum may shift the diaphragm cranially and decrease respiratory compliance.

Compression of basal lung regions due to a stiffened diaphragm would accelerate the formation of absorption atelectasis that was already initiated during anesthesia induction.

Such deterioration is associated with pulmonary densities revealed by computed tomography. In addition to physiologic impairment, atelectasis could contribute to perioperative lung injury and PPC.

The RM with PEEP has been advocated as efficient for atelectasis treatment. Reports on the impact of FiO2 during RM on atelectasis development are rare, and have not limited FiO2 to the RM per se.

While RM with high FiO2 can improve oxygenation rapidly, there is a greater possibility of absorption atelectasis occurring.

Diagnostic ultrasonography is the only clinical imaging technology in use that does not depend on electromagnetic radiation. Lung ultrasonography can be considered an attractive complementary diagnostic tool and one of the most promising techniques (Daabis et al., 2014). Therefore, Lung ultrasonography is a safe and cheap tool used during the perioperative period and to detect intraoperative respiratory complications resulting from absorption atelectasis.

The modified Lung Ultrasound Score (LUSS) system involves examination of all intercostal spaces: each hemi-thorax is divided into six regions: 2 anterior, 2 lateral and 2 posterior with four longitudinal lines and one axial line [figure 1 (B, C)]. Each region score shows sufficient sensitivity to detect loss of aeration during laparoscopic surgery. The degree of de-aeration rated from 0 to 3 (zero for no atelectasis and 3 for complete atelectasis ) defining substantial atelectasis as a score of 2 or 3 assigned to any region

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 18 - 60 years old.
  • Both genders.
  • Preoperative Physical Status: ASA II, III Patients.
  • BMI above 40 Kg/m2.
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgeries: laparoscopic mini gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and revision bariatric surgery (redo bariatric surgery) with the presence of atelectasis confirmed radiologically by Chest X-ray (CXR) and CT Chest

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal of the intervention or participation in the study.
  • Patient under age of 18 years old or above 60 years old.
  • Preoperative Physical Status: ASA I, IV.
  • Psychiatric illness.
  • Known cases of chronic pulmonary disease e.g. COPD and bronchial asthma.
  • Known cases of cardiac diseases.
  • Previous lung surgery.
  • Lactation.

Treatment and study plan

High versus Low Fraction of Inspired Oxygen

Procedure

to compare the effect of high oxygen fraction (FiO2 1.0) vs. low oxygen fraction (FiO2 0.4) on clinical outcome on intraoperative and postoperative atelectasis and PPC. We will asses the impact of FiO2, especially during RM, on atelectasis development, using modified LUSS in obese patients with atelectasis undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Lung Ultrasound Score (LUSS)

    Time frame: from 0 hours to 6 hours after the procedure

    • Modified LUSS at surgery completion compared to baseline preoperative modified LUSS, reflecting any aeration loss during general anesthesia.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Egymedicalpedia

Industry

Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Effect of High Versus Low Fraction of Inspired Oxygen During Alveolar Recruitment on Absorption Atelectasis in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Patients With Atelectasis

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 10, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.