Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07228182

Effect of High-Intensity Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Gambling Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The investigators assume that High-intensity transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HI-tACS) could improve gambling disorder patients' executive-control function by modulating abnormal neural activity, particularly gamma-band oscillations, which are closely associated with executive-control deficits. This study intends to validate the effect of HI-tACS treatment, which has been discovered in the previous pilot study. A three-month follow-up assessment will be conducted to test the changes in executive-control function and its underlying mechanism.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Gambling disorder has become a major social and public health problem in China. Executive-control dysfunction is the main symptom of behavioral addictions such as gambling disorder. Previous studies have demonstrated that abnormal neural activity is distributed across multiple brain regions and networks throughout the whole brain. Research has shown that abnormal neural activity, particularly in the gamma band, contributes to executive-control deficits. High-intensity transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (HI-tACS) has been found to improve executive-control function by modulating this abnormal gamma-band activity. However, this has not yet been verified in gambling disorder patients. The investigators assume that HI-tACS could improve gambling disorder patients' executive-control function by modulating abnormal gamma-band neural activity, which is closely associated with executive-control deficits. This study intends to test the effect of HI-tACS treatment, which was discovered in a previous pilot study. A three-month follow-up assessment will be conducted to examine changes in executive-control function and its underlying mechanism. This study will provide a practical and theoretical basis for developing a novel treatment for gambling disorder.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-60, male or female, with 9 or more years of education, and able to complete questionnaire evaluation and behavioral tests;
  • Meet DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders,DSM) diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder;
  • Have gambled for at least one year (at least once a week);
  • Normal vision and hearing, or within the normal range after correction;
  • Agree to cooperate in the follow-up evaluation;
  • No metal implantation in the head, no history of nerve problems or head injury, and no skin sensitivity.

Exclusion criteria

  • Have severe cognitive impairment, such as a history of head trauma, -cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, etc.;
  • Have used drugs promoting cognitive function in the last 6 months;
  • Have impaired intelligence (Intelligence Quotient<70);
  • Abuse or dependence of psychoactive substances (except nicotine) in the last 5 years.

Treatment and study plan

HI-tACS

Device

Three conductive electrodes are placed overhead. In the 10/20 international placement system, a 4.45 9.53 cm electrode is placed on the forehead corresponding to Fpz, Fp1 and Fp2. Two 3.18 3.81 cm electrodes are placed on the mastoid region of each side. The tACS stimulation waveform includes ramp-up and ramp-down periods of 180 and 12 s, respectively. The frequency of stimulation is 77.5Hz, and the current is 15mA.

Sham stimulation

Device

Three conductive electrodes are placed overhead. In the 10/20 international placement system, a 4.45 9.53 cm electrode is placed on the forehead corresponding to Fpz, Fp1 and Fp2. Two 3.18 3.81 cm electrodes are placed on the mastoid region of each side. The appearance of the above-mentioned equipment is identical to that of the real stimulation group devices, but it only simulates the electrical sensation produced at the beginning and end of stimulation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the gambling symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Gambling symptom severity will be measured by the Pathological Gambling Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS). The total score of PG-YBOCS ranges from 0 to 40, in which higher scores indicate more severe pathological gambling symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of depressive symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Depressive symptoms will be measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). The total score of HAMD-17 ranges from 0 to 52, in which higher scores mean a higher severity of depressive symptoms.

  2. Change of anxiety symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Anxiety symptoms will be measured by the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14). The total score of HAMA-14 ranges from 0 to 56, in which higher scores mean a higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

  3. Change of the sleep quality

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Sleep quality will be measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The total score of PSQI ranges from 0 to 21, in which higher scores mean poorer sleep quality.

  4. Change of the gambling craving

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Gambling craving will be measured by the gambling craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The total score of VAS ranges from 0 to 10, in which higher scores mean a higher level of gambling craving.

  5. Side effect of the modulation

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

    Side effects will be assessed using a standardized adverse reaction evaluation form. The total score varies depending on symptom severity, with higher scores indicating more significant adverse reactions.

  6. Change of the self-control ability

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Self-control ability will be measured by the Self-Control Scale (SCS). Higher scores of SCS indicate better self-regulation and impulse control.

  7. Change of the gambling symptom severity

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, two weeks after the intervention, one month after the intervention, two months after the intervention, three months after the intervention

    Gambling symptom severity will be measured by the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS). The total score of G-SAS ranges from 0 to 48, in which higher scores mean more severe gambling-related symptoms.

  8. Change of the risky decision-making performance

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

    Risky decision-making performance will be assessed using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Higher average pumps in the BART indicate greater risk-taking propensity. Electroencephalography (EEG) will be used to measure neural electrical signals, where increases in relevant electrophysiological indicators may reflect heightened individual sensitivity to negative feedback.

    Pig dice game will be administered during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning to assess risk-taking decision-making. Higher frequency of continued dice rolls indicates greater risk propensity. Neural activity features related to the task will be analyzed, with specific patterns associated with risk evaluation and reward processing.

  9. Change of the inhibitory control performance

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

    The stop-signal task (SST) will be employed to measure inhibitory control, with longer stop-signal reaction times (SSRT) indicating poorer response inhibition. Concurrent EEG recording will be performed, and changes in relevant electrophysiological indicators can serve as electrophysiological markers of increased cognitive conflict and reduced inhibitory processing efficiency.

  10. Change of the resting state neural activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

    Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) will be used to assess intrinsic brain connectivity. Resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) will be employed to measure spontaneous neural oscillations.

Other outcomes

  1. Individualized Electric Field Simulation and Dose Estimation

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

    Structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) with T1-weighted imaging, along with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), will be employed to construct individualized head models for simulating the electric field distribution of HI-tACS. This approach will allow us to estimate the individualized stimulation intensity and assess the optimal dose for each participant.

  2. Change of the molecular-level neurochemistry

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention.

    SPICE fast spectroscopic imaging will be employed to measure molecular-level neurochemical metabolites. This technique enables simultaneous acquisition of spatial distribution and concentration changes of multiple metabolites and neurotransmitter-related indicators within a single clinically acceptable scan time, allowing for assessment of brain molecular metabolic spectrum remodeling before and after the intervention.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jiang Du, MD, PhD.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8602164906315

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Mental Health Center

Other

Registry information

Acronym: HITACSRCT-GD

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 14, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.