Effect of High-Intensity Exercise to Attenuate Cognitive Function Limitations and Train Exercise Habits in Older People Living With HIV

The population of people with HIV (PWH) is aging, and are at higher risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) than seronegative counterparts. Although physical activity (PA) is a promising protective factor to mitigate ADRD risk, few well-powered PA intervention studies have rigorously tested cognitive outcomes among older PWH, a population with rates of moderate to vigorous PA well below recommended guidelines. Further, given that adherence to habitual PA diminishes after supervised interventions, identifying mechanisms of adherence (MoA) to habitual PA among older PWH is germane to develop effective and durable interventions to protect cognitive health. The proposed R01 will leverage the High-Intensity Exercise Study to Attenuate Limitations and Train Habits in Older Adults With HIV (HEALTH), a two-site RCT (University of Washington [UW], University of Colorado Denver [UCD]) of 100 older PWH examining: 1) if 4 months of supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) mitigates physical function impairments and fatigue to a greater extent than continuous moderate exercise (CME); 2) the effects of a 3 month text-messaging intervention on PA adherence. In contrast to CME, where aerobic exercise is performed continuously for a specified duration, HIIT, which uses repeated alternating bouts of highintensity and lower intensity aerobic exercise, has shown superior efficacy in improving physiological and cognitive outcomes, and is associated with superior enjoyment which may increase adherence to PA regimens. The proposed R01 (HEALTH-COG) will leverage the two HEALTH sites, add a new racially diverse UAB site, and add new measures (psychological MoA measures, cognitive function assessments, biomarkers) and a few 12 month follow-up to the parent study. We estimate that of our planned sample of N=100, n=50 will be enrolled at UAB and n=50 total at UW and UCD. Our primary aim is to compare the effects of a 4 month supervised HIIT or CME intervention on (1°) cognitive functioning and (2°) subjective cognitive symptoms. Our exploratory aim is to evaluate putative biomarkers underlying the effect of PA on cognition (blood markers: e.g., BDNF, VEGF, IL-6 and neuroimaging markers: cerebral blood flow, resting state functional connectivity, and brain volume). Our secondary aim is to determine MoA to long-term PA maintenance at 12 months. This aim will examine distal predictors of long-term PA, including sociodemographic, clinical, and intervention factors (i.e., changes in parent R01 physical outcomes [cardiorespiratory fitness], condition [HIIT vs CME], [coaching vs control]), as well as proximal psychological MoA assessed in real-time, using EMA (e.g., self-efficacy, perceived benefits, motivation, social support). Testing efficacy and mechanisms of exercise interventions on cognitive outcomes and understanding psychological MoA of habitual PA following supervised interventions will aid in the development and implementation of personalized medicine approaches for the treatment and prevention of cognitive impairment and ADRD in older PWH.

Inclusion criteria

• Confirmed HIV
• Sedentary lifestyle, defined as self-reported PA that breaks a sweat <3 days/week, with no regular resistance exercise for 3 months preceding study;
• Fatigued (≥2.0 on either of the first two screening items on the HIV-Related Fatigue Scale)
• On a current, contemporary ART regimen for >=12 months;
• HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL in the past 12 months (assessed via medical records)
• Willing to engage in a supervised exercise program 3 times/week for 4 months
• Cell phone or email to accept messages
• Weight <450 lbs
• Medical clearance by study healthcare professional

Exclusion criteria

• Weight over 450 pounds
• Use of sex hormone therapy, if on for ≤3 months (stable doses for >3 months will be permitted)
• Use of other hormone replacement, if on for ≤ 3 months (stable doses >3 months will be permitted)
• Anemia (Hemoglobin ≤9 g/dL for women or ≤10 g/dL for men) due to contribution to fatigue,
• Diagnosis of mitochondrial disease,
• Active substance abuse or other factors that could prevent compliance or safety with study visits, at the discretion of the site investigator,
• Reasons for medical exclusion, as determined by Nurse Practioner:

• Uncontrolled hypertension defined as resting systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg; participants who do not meet these criteria at first screening will be reevaluated, including follow-up evaluation by their primary care provider with initiation or adjustment of anti-hypertensive medications,
• Unstable ischemic heart disease (e.g., angina, ST segment depression) or serious arrhythmias at rest or during the graded exercise test without negative follow-up evaluation will be cause for exclusion; follow-up evaluation must include diagnostic testing (e.g., thallium stress test) with interpretation by a cardiologist,
• New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, uncontrolled angina, or uncontrolled arrhythmia,
• Pulmonary disease requiring the use of supplemental oxygen at rest or with physical exertion,
• Malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiation therapy within 24 weeks prior to enrollment,
• Poorly controlled diabetes, as evidenced by hemoglobin A1c > 8.5, documented within 6 months of study visit or current use of insulin,
• Surgery/trauma/injury/fracture within 24 weeks prior to enrollment that, in the opinion of the study clinician, may impact a subject's baseline functional testing and ability to exercise,
• Balance impairments that may impact functional testing and ability to safely exercise as reported by the participant or in their medical record,
• Orthopedic problems (e.g., severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis) that greatly limit the ability to perform moderate intensity resistance exercise (e.g., unable to be properly positioned in exercise equipment or to have severely restricted range of motion even after modifications have been made),
• Persons who, in the judgment of the study clinician, appear to have unstable health or are incapable of safely participating in the exercise intervention.