Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital
Konya, 42080, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07436520
This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether a guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure technique reduces postoperative pain and improves early functional recovery compared with classical continuous fascial closure in women undergoing elective cesarean section.
Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, and postoperative pain may delay mobilization and recovery. Fascial closure technique may influence postoperative pain by affecting tissue tension and alignment. The guide-suture-assisted modified closure technique is designed to improve fascial alignment and reduce mechanical tension during closure.
Participants undergoing elective cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure. Postoperative pain intensity is assessed using validated pain scales, and functional recovery is evaluated by measuring walking distance during the early postoperative period.
The study aims to determine whether this modified surgical technique improves postoperative comfort and facilitates earlier mobilization compared with the conventional technique.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Konya, 42080, Turkey (Türkiye)
This prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates the effect of a guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure technique on postoperative pain and functional recovery following elective cesarean section.
Eligible participants include women aged 18 to 35 years undergoing elective cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified continuous fascial closure using a sealed-envelope randomization method.
All procedures are performed by the same experienced surgeon under spinal anesthesia using standardized surgical techniques. In the classical closure group, fascial closure is performed using continuous suturing with Vicryl 1-0 (polyglactin 910). In the modified closure group, a guide suture is first placed at the intended terminal corner of the fascial incision to improve alignment and reduce tissue tension, followed by continuous fascial closure using the same suture material.
Postoperative pain is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Functional recovery is evaluated by measuring walking distance at the same time points. Postoperative analgesic use within 48 hours is also recorded.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether the modified fascial closure technique reduces early postoperative pain compared with classical continuous closure. Secondary objectives include assessment of functional recovery and analgesic requirements.
This study provides evidence regarding a simple surgical modification that may improve postoperative recovery following cesarean section.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Women aged 18 to 35 years
Scheduled for elective cesarean section
Singleton pregnancy
Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I or II
Planned cesarean section with Pfannenstiel incision
Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Emergency cesarean section
History of previous cesarean section
Severe intra-abdominal adhesions
Known coagulopathy or bleeding disorders
Active infection
Intraoperative complications
Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
-
Fascial closure was performed using a conventional continuous suturing technique with Vicryl 1-0 (polyglactin 910). The suture was started at one corner of the fascial incision and continued to the opposite end without the use of a guide suture. All other surgical procedures were standardized.
A guide suture using Vicryl 1-0 (polyglactin 910) was placed at the terminal corner of the fascial incision prior to continuous closure. This guide suture was used to improve fascial alignment and reduce tissue tension. Continuous fascial closure was then performed using Vicryl 1-0. All other surgical procedures were standardized.
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean section
Postoperative pain intensity is assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater pain severity. Pain scores are recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours following surgery and compared between the classical continuous fascial closure group and the guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure group.
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean section
Pain during movement is assessed using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Scores are recorded at each postoperative time point.
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean section
Pain quality and intensity are evaluated using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), which assesses sensory and affective components of pain.
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean section
Functional recovery is assessed by measuring walking distance in meters at each postoperative time point. Greater walking distance indicates better functional recovery.
Time frame: Within 48 hours after cesarean section
The type and frequency of analgesic medications administered during the first 48 hours after surgery are recorded and compared between study groups.
Necmettin Erbakan University
Other
Effect of a Guide-Suture-Assisted Modified Fascial Closure Technique on Postoperative Pain and Early Mobilization After Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Component
Acronym: GSMF-CS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06813638
Agnosia, Cesarean Delivery
Hillerød, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07720440
Agnosia, Behavior
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07626138
Cesarean Section, Neurologic Manifestations
Niğde, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07516717
Cesarean Section, Neurologic Manifestations
Caracas, Miranda, Venezuela
View Trial Details