Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry
Ankara, 06490, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06392256
The goal of this randomized clinical study is to investigate the impact of soft tissue phenotype modification following free gingival grafting (FGG) in addition to the non-surgical mechanical therapy of peri-implant mucositis (PM) with keratinized mucosa width (KMW) < 2 mm over a 6-month follow-up period. Therefore, the following questions related to the study are raised:
• Does soft tissue modification following free gingival grafting around the implants with KMW < 2 mm, in addition to non-surgical mechanical therapy of PM, affect the change in bleeding on probing and the rate of complete disease resolution?
Patients who apply to the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, are systemically healthy, have implant-supported restorations installed at least one year prior to their enrollment, and are diagnosed with PM on these implants will be selected for the study. Patients with KMW < 2 mm at the respective implant sites will be treated with non-surgical mechanical treatment combined with soft tissue augmentation with FGG or non-surgical mechanical treatment alone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, 06490, Turkey (Türkiye)
The primary goal of treating peri-implant mucositis (PM) is to disturb the dental implant biofilm and resolve inflammatory conditions. This aims to achieve treatment success or complete disease resolution, preventing its progression to peri-implantitis. Indeed, regardless of the non-surgical mechanical/physical instrumentation approaches and despite noticeable clinical improvements, none of the existing procedures would result in complete disease resolution [i.e., absence of bleeding on probing (BOP)] in peri-implant mucositis. Taking this into account, the execution of interventions targeted at managing modifiable risk factors plays a pivotal role in maintaining peri-implant health.
Despite the increasing evidence documenting that implant sites exhibiting either a lacking or a reduced keratinized mucosa (KM) of ≤2 mm demonstrate difficulties in eliminating bacterial biofilm, leading to inflammation around the soft tissue, the requirement for a minimum peri-implant KM width (KMW) to avoid peri-implant diseases has been a highly debated topic. Indeed, KM augmentation at implant sites with a reduced KMW has been reported to be associated with statistically significant lower plaque and gingival scores as well as peri-implant probing depths (PPD) when compared with non-augmented sites. However, there is no study evaluating primarily the effect of KM augmentation on maintaining peri-implant health and preventing peri-implant diseases.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of soft tissue phenotype modification following free gingival grafting in addition to the non-surgical submarginal instrumentation of peri-implant mucositis over a 6-month follow-up period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Peri-implant Mucositis
Exclusion criteria
Non-surgical submarginal instrumentation using titanium curettes with saline irrigation will be done once in the treatment session.
In the PM-NS-FGG group, soft tissue augmentation using a free gingival graft will be performed.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after the treatment
The number of BoP around the implants
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after the treatment
The absence of BoP at more than one site per implant and deepest PPD≤5 mm.
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after the treatment
The distance between the bottom of the pocket and mucosal margin around the implants
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after the treatment
The distance between the peri-implant mucosal margin and the mucogingival junction and recorded to the nearest millimeter using a UNC periodontal probe
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after the treatment
KTT will be measured 1 mm below the mucosal margin inserting an endodontic reamer to the soft tissue, and measuring the distance between the tip of the reamer and the stopper through a digital caliper. Mucosal thickness was also categorized as thick (≥2 mm) and thin (<2 mm)
Time frame: 3 and 6 months after the treatment
The distance between the apical margin of the crown to the peri-implant mucosal margin, including exposure of the prosthetic abutment, with or without the exposure of the implant-treated surface
Gazi University
Other
The Influence of Soft Tissue Phenotype Modification Following Free Gingival Grafting on the Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05024760
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Infection
Tacoma, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06645444
Peri-implant Mucositis
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07047261
Peri-implant Mucositis
Torino, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07530211
Behavior, Bone Diseases
Battalgazi, Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details