Screening without fee
OtherAll women in three districts in Gothenburg, Sweden, that were eligible for invitation in the regular screening program were individually randomized by computer program in two parallel arms 1:1.
NCT Number: NCT02378324
Several reasons can explain non-attendance in cervical cancer screening. In low resource settings the attendance is even lower. The effect of fee as contributing reason of non attendance has not been studied before why the investigators decided to study this in a low resource setting as a randomised trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me23 year–60 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Non-attendance in the cervical cancer screening programme is the most important factors why Swedish women contract the disease. Low attendance rate is observed in districts with low socioeconomic resources. Several reasons can explain this, including the existence of a fee. A low attendance rate in low resource districts is also noticed in Gothenburg, Sweden. After multiple interventions the coverage has slightly increased. None of the interventions included the aspect of the fee. The investigators decided to study the effect of fee abolishment in a randomized control trial emanating from the regular cervical cancer-screening program. Method: Randomized Control Trial (RCT). Women in low resource areas of Gothenburg, due for screening, January-July 2013, were randomised to receive an offer of a free test or receiving the regular invitation stating the regular fee of 100 Swedish kronor (SEK) (≈11 €). Power calculation has shown 80 % power to detect an increase in participation of 20% at 1972 participants.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All women in three districts in Gothenburg, Sweden, that were eligible for invitation in the regular screening program were individually randomized by computer program in two parallel arms 1:1.
Time frame: 6 months
Information from the database regarding study arm was linked, via citizen unique personal number, to the National Cervical Screening Quality Register. From this database aggregated information of attendance was extracted. The effect of the intervention on attendance was calculated as relative risks.
Time frame: 6 months
Before analysing the results of which kind of invitation the woman got, age group, previous pap smear history and district, all personal information was anonymized.
Göteborg University
Other
Effect of Fee on Attendance in Cervical Cancer Screening-results From ScreenFee a Swedish Population Based Randomised Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05132114
Cervical Dysplasia, Female Urogenital Diseases
Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01989923
Behavior, Cervical Dysplasia
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05870787
Cervical Cancer, Cervical Disease
Fredericia, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06054841
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cervical Dysplasia
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details