University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
Linz, Upper Austria, 4020, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07197879
As a follow-up project to the Dyn-Sit-Pain study, this research aims to investigate the overall health as well as the physical and mental well-being through dynamic office chairs. The development of an innovative dynamic office chair concept will be professionally and scientifically supported, and the developed prototypes will be examined within the framework of usability studies.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Linz, Upper Austria, 4020, Austria
Location status: Recruiting
This clinical trial is a prospective, randomised, controlled, open-label study with two tracks, each in a cross-over design investigating the effect of of two dynamic office chairs (saddle chair with standard pendulum mechanism [Smart Moving Technology], study track 2 = office swivel chair with integrated newly developed pendulum mechanism [Smart Moving Technology New]) on the musculoskeletal system of office workers classified as pain developers.
The study consists of a pre-screening visit and 4 assessment days / visits. After proving eligibility for the study (inclusion/exclusion criteria), subjects are assigned to one of the two study tracks. Subjects are randomised to one of the two study tracks and then to the respective group (Group A to D).
Depending on the study track and group allocation, the test subjects first receive a dynamic office chair (= intervention) or a static office chair (= control). The randomization will be realized with opaque envelopes in different colours and follows international recommendations.
Overall participants will execute identical assessments. A wash-put period between the control and the intervention phases ensures identical baseline conditions. The overall duration of study participation equals 16 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The dynamic office chair has a typical office chair design (e.g. seat pan and a lumbar support). The seat pan is mounted on a flexible mechanic construction that allows hip movements in the frontal plane while sitting.
The dynamic office chair has a typical office chair design (e.g. seat pan and a lumbar support). The seat pan is mounted on a flexible mechanic construction that allows hip movements in the frontal plane while sitting.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participants will rate their subjectively perceived lower back pain before and after a conventional occupational day on 5 consecutive days starting at baseline (week 1) and ending with the post-intervention visit (week 6). Subjectively perceived lower back pain will be assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 points (strongest pain imaginable).
Question: Please rate the level of your lower back pain at this moment.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participants will rate their subjectively perceived mental fatigue before and after a conventional occupational day on 5 consecutive days starting at baseline (week 1) and ending with the post-intervention visit (week 6). Subjectively perceived mental fatigue will be assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (none) to 100 points (strongest mental fatigue imaginable).
Question: Please rate the level of your mental fatigue at this moment.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participants will rate their subjectively perceived working performance before and after a conventional occupational day on 5 consecutive days starting at baseline (week 1) and ending with the post-intervention visit (week 6). Subjectively perceived working performance will be assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS used for this study ranges from 0 (not productive at all) to 100 points (very productive).
Question: Please rate the level of your working performance on this working day.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Participants will rate their subjectively perceived pain with the German version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-D) at the baseline and post-intervention visits.
The ODI-D coverts 10 items: Pain intensity, Personal care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Sex (if applicable), Social and Travel. Each item consists of 6 statements which are scored from 0 (lowest disability) to 5 (highest disability).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Subjects will rate the usability of the dynamic chair with the German version of the User Experience Questionnaire-Short version (UEQ-S) at the relevant post-intervention visit.
The UEQ-S cover both classical usability aspects (efficiency, perspicuity, dependability) and user experience aspects (originality, stimulation). It consists of 8 items, each rated on a seven-point scale with a ranked order. The endpoints of the items are (left to right): obstructive to supportive / complicated to easy / inefficient to efficient / confusing to clear / boring to exciting / not interesting to interesting / conventional to inventive and usual to leading edge.
Time frame: 6 weeks
The usage of the interventional chair will be tracked (i.e., the system cannot detect which person is sitting on it) by means of a microcontroller to determine if the dynamic chair was used or replaced within the interventional period.
Time frame: 16 weeks
In the diary and at all study visits participants will be asked for new adverse events.
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions Upper Austria
Other
Effect of Dynamic Sitting on Pain Development - Part 2 - a Randomized Controlled Cross-over Study
Acronym: DynSit-Pain 2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07587047
Back Pain, Chronic Lower Back Pain
Winter Park, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07615816
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Joint Base Lewis McChord, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04982965
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07040397
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details