Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02917837

Effect of Diagnostic Imaging Utilization Reports

Diagnostic imaging (DI) tests (for example, x-ray tests, ultrasounds, CT scans, or MRIs) are used by health care providers to help diagnose patient illness, but decisions regarding when these tests should be ordered are subjective. As a result, some physicians order these tests more than others. Ordering rates between clinicians seeing similar kinds of patients have been shown to be considerably different, suggesting that many of the tests are unnecessary. DI currently accounts for about 6.6% of Canadian hospital budgets, but this percentage may be much higher in Newfoundland where test ordering rates are almost twice the national average. However, cost is not the only concern. Over-testing can lead to further unnecessary testing to follow-up on harmless findings, and in the case of CT, large doses of potentially harmful radiation. We suspect that many clinicians are not aware that they order more DI tests than their peers. We will therefore develop a "report card" for family physicians in the province that shows them how many tests they are ordering compared to other physicians in the region. We expect that physicians who are over-ordering DI tests will reduce the number of tests they order after receiving their report cards. This is a low-cost way to potentially prevent expensive over-ordering of DI tests that can easily be implemented in the province's other health regions and elsewhere. The Quality of Care Newfoundland and Labrador (QCNL) organization in the province currently provides feedback reports and in-person detailing sessions to physicians, but the effectiveness of these interventions has not been studied.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Health Sciences Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B3V6, Canada

About this study

The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two versions of a DI utilization feedback report for family physicians, and determine whether in-person detailing sessions offer additional benefit in changing ordering practices. Group practices (i.e. all physicians practicing at the same address) of family physicians and general practitioners will be stratified by community of practice within Eastern Health, then randomized into one of four groups: 1. A usual QCNL feedback report alone, 2. A usual QCNL feedback report plus in-person detailing, 3. A new feedback report alone, 4. A new feedback report plus in-person detailing. Communities with fewer than five physicians will be grouped with similar communities for stratified randomization purposes.

Physicians will be provided a semi-annual (every 6 months) report card outlining the number of CT scans, ultrasounds and plain x-rays they ordered per 100 patients for whom they were the primary provider. We will assume that the primary provider is the most frequent biller of primary care services. Participants will receive a link to the report card via email from the Newfoundland and Labrador Medical Association (NLMA) by a two-step process: The initial email gives a brief description of the report and contains a link which then redirects the clinician to a secure web page that displays the individual clinician diagnostic imaging utilization in a prior one year period compared to the aggregate of their peers in the same region. Physicians in the detailing groups will be contacted to arrange a single in-person session with one of their colleagues to discuss the detailing reports.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

There are no restrictions on the age of participants.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1) All family physicians or general practitioners practicing within Eastern Health. In order to obtain an accurate assessment of the report in real-world implementation, we are requesting the right to enroll everyone who meets the inclusion criteria, and to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent
  • 2) Be the most frequent provider of primary care billings for a minimum of 20 patients during the period.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1) Physicians who will be within the Eastern Health network for a relatively short period, e.g. clinicians engaged in an exchange program for training, or locums.

Treatment and study plan

Usual QCNL DI utilization report

Other

See arm descriptions.

New DI utilization report

Other

See arm descriptions.

Detailing

Other

In-person detailing, usually with a small group of family physicians and a peer (physician) facilitator to discuss the topic over a 30-60 minute period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Combined CT, x-ray and ultrasound exam orders per patient

    Time frame: 1 year

    Number of DI tests ordered per patient seen

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinician subgroup Diagnostic imaging exam orders per patient

    Time frame: 1 year

    Clinicians will be divided into high and low test ordering subgroups (based on pre-intervention ordering practices). The primary outcome will be measured in these subgroups as a secondary outcome.

  2. Uptake of detailing

    Time frame: 1 year

    Proportion of invited physicians who take part in a detailing session

  3. CT exam orders per patient

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. X-ray exam orders per patient

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Ultrasound exam orders per patient

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Uptake of utilization reports

    Time frame: 1 year

    Proportion of physicians in report groups who open the link for the online report.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Memorial University of Newfoundland

Other

Collaborators

  • NL SUPPORT Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of a Diagnostic Imaging Utilization Report on Family Physician Ordering Practices in the Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 28, 2016
Registry last updated
Oct 11, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.