Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06710119

Effect of Custom Dynamic Orthoses on Forefoot Loading

The proposed study is designed to evaluate how foot loading changes during initial accommodation to a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO), after targeted training with or without visual feedback of foot loading, and after take-home use of the CDO. This study will quantify initial offloading associated with CDO use and determine if visual feedback of foot loading and additional take-home use of the CDO can further reduce forces, as orthotists work to provide CDOs to patients.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is designed to evaluate the effects of initial accommodation, CDO related training, and take-home use on foot loading during gait. In this study, adult participants who experienced an injury below the knee and require a CDO will walk without the CDO, then with the CDO following initial prescription, after training with or without visual force feedback, and after additional take-home use of the CDO. Participants will be randomized to to training with or without visual feedback of foot loading forces.

Wireless force measuring sensors will be used to measure forces under the foot with and without the CDO at each time point. Participants will complete questionnaires to assess and compare various patient outcomes (e.g. pain, quality of life, comfort, satisfaction, and preference).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Patient Inclusion criteria

  • Ages: 18-65
  • Sustained a function limiting injury below the knee, requiring a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis
  • Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 13
  • Any of the following: weakness of ankle plantarflexors (<4/5 on MMT), limited pain free ankle motion (DF<10deg or PF<20deg), mechanical pain with loading onto hindfoot/midfoot/forefoot (>4/10 on verbal numeric pain rating scale), ankle or hindfoot fusion, candidate for ankle or hindfoot fusion, candidate for amputation secondary to ankle/foot impairment
  • Ability to walk 25 feet without using a cane or crutch
  • Ability to walk at a slow to moderate pace
  • Able to read and write in English and provide written informed consent

Patient Exclusion criteria

  • Pain > 9/10 while walking
  • Ankle weakness as a result of spinal cord injury or central nervous system pathology
  • AFO or CDO prescription that includes a knee brace or goes up to thigh
  • Medical or psychological conditions that would preclude functional testing (ex. severe traumatic brain injury, heart condition, clotting disorder, lung condition, stroke, vestibular disorder)
  • Nerve, muscle, bone, or other condition limiting function of the contralateral extremity
  • BMI greater than 40
  • Visual or hearing impairment that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Visual feedback

Other

Visual feedback of foot loading during gait.

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak Plantar Force (Forefoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Maximum force (N) collected from the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) during gait.

  2. Plantar Force Impulse (Forefoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak Plantar Force (Midfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Maximum force (N) collected from the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) during gait.

  2. Plantar Force Impulse (Midfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.

  3. Peak Plantar Force (Hindfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Maximum force (N) collected from the hindfoot (proximal 30% of sensor) during gait.

  4. Plantar Force Impulse (Hindfoot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the hindfoot (proximal 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.

  5. Peak Plantar Force (Total Foot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Maximum force (N) collected from the total foot (100% of sensor) during gait.

  6. Plantar Force Impulse (Total Foot)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.

Other outcomes

  1. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Comfort)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable.

  2. Modified Socket Comfort Score (Smoothness)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Smoothness scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth.

  3. Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.

  4. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (Physical Function)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.

  5. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (Pain Interference)

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) pain interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.

  6. Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey - Satisfaction with Service

    Time frame: Baseline

    Satisfaction with services will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Services Score (10-50). Lower scores indicate a better outcome.

  7. Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey - Satisfaction with Device

    Time frame: Baseline

    Satisfaction with device will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device Score (11-55). Lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

319-335-6857

Kirsten M Anderson, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

319-353-0431

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Iowa

Other

Collaborators

  • Cornerstone Clinics, Everett, WA

Registry information

Acronym: LoadsolCP

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Nov 29, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 31, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.