Visual feedback
OtherVisual feedback of foot loading during gait.
NCT Number: NCT06710119
The proposed study is designed to evaluate how foot loading changes during initial accommodation to a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO), after targeted training with or without visual feedback of foot loading, and after take-home use of the CDO. This study will quantify initial offloading associated with CDO use and determine if visual feedback of foot loading and additional take-home use of the CDO can further reduce forces, as orthotists work to provide CDOs to patients.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
This study is designed to evaluate the effects of initial accommodation, CDO related training, and take-home use on foot loading during gait. In this study, adult participants who experienced an injury below the knee and require a CDO will walk without the CDO, then with the CDO following initial prescription, after training with or without visual force feedback, and after additional take-home use of the CDO. Participants will be randomized to to training with or without visual feedback of foot loading forces.
Wireless force measuring sensors will be used to measure forces under the foot with and without the CDO at each time point. Participants will complete questionnaires to assess and compare various patient outcomes (e.g. pain, quality of life, comfort, satisfaction, and preference).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Patient Inclusion criteria
Patient Exclusion criteria
Visual feedback of foot loading during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Maximum force (N) collected from the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the forefoot (distal 40% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.
Time frame: Baseline
Maximum force (N) collected from the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the midfoot (middle 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.
Time frame: Baseline
Maximum force (N) collected from the hindfoot (proximal 30% of sensor) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the hindfoot (proximal 30% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.
Time frame: Baseline
Maximum force (N) collected from the total foot (100% of sensor) during gait.
Time frame: Baseline
Plantar force impulse (Ns) across the total foot (100% of sensor) will be calculated using the integral of the force over the stance phase as participants walk.
Time frame: Baseline
Comfort scores range from 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable.
Time frame: Baseline
Smoothness scores range from 0 = least smooth to 10 = most smooth.
Time frame: Baseline
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.
Time frame: Baseline
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) pain interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents more of the measured variable than the population average.
Time frame: Baseline
Satisfaction with services will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Services Score (10-50). Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline
Satisfaction with device will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device Score (11-55). Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD
CONTACT
Kirsten M Anderson, PhD
CONTACT
University of Iowa
Other
Acronym: LoadsolCP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07289828
Ankle Injuries, Knee Injuries
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01092286
Ankle Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details