Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01326975

Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Delivered by Two Different Modalities on Breathing Pattern in Preterm Infants

In this study, the investigators want to observe how continuous positive airway pressure delivered by two different modalities affects breathing pattern in small preterm infants. Using a specialized feeding tube in the stomach, the investigators can measure and compare how the diaphragm (a large breathing muscle) might be affected by those two modalities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Apnea Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Obstetric Labor Complications Obstetric Labor, Premature Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Pregnancy Complications Premature Birth Respiration Disorders Respiratory Tract Diseases Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory Urogenital Diseases

Age range

2 day–12 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

About this study

Many preterm very low birth weight infants require continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) for breathing support because of lung immaturity. CPAP can be delivered by the infant flow(TM) device which is well studied. Prolonged use of nasal prongs CPAP has been shown to cause discomfort and, rarely, nasal injury leading to long term disfigurement. On the other hand, High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) ,which is another modality of delivering CPAP, creates less pressure on the nose and less disfiguring effect but previous research showed that the use of HFNC may be less effective than IF-CPAP in providing breathing support in these infants.

We plan to study 10 stable preterm infants born less than 32 weeks' gestation and 1.5 kilograms at birth after being stable for at least 48hours on IF-CPAP. babies will be randomized to start on IF-CPAP or HFNC for 30 minutes. After 45 minutes of adaptation, baby will be switched to the other modality for another 30 minutes. By inserting a specialized feeding tube with sensors into the stomach, we can measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi). By analysing EAdi with each modality of delivering CPAP, we want to directly assess how HFNC affects breathing compared to IF-CPAP.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Birth weights ≤ 1500g
  • Gestational age less than 32 week
  • Stable on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5-6cmH20 support for at least 48 hours
  • Treated with methylxanthines for apnea of prematurity
  • In less than 35% oxygen

Exclusion criteria

  • Congenital and acquired problem of the gastrointestinal tract
  • Phrenic nerve injury and/or diaphragm paralysis
  • Esophageal perforation/tracheoesophageal fistula
  • Congenital/acquired neurological deficit and/or seizures
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Congenital heart disease (including symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus)
  • Undergoing treatment for sepsis or pneumonia
  • Use of muscle relaxants, narcotic analgesics, or gastric motility agents
  • Congenital anomalies of respiratory tract (e.g. CCAM)
  • Infants requiring more than 35% oxygen
  • Infants with facial anomalies
  • Infants with pneumothorax and/or pneumomediatinum
  • Infants in the immediate postoperative period
  • Infants with significant gastric residues and vomiting

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. The difference in the tonic EAdi between IF-CPAP and HFNC .

    Time frame: During the 4-hour study period.

    Patients will be randomized in two groups, one group will start on IF-CPAP for 30 minutes. After another 45 minutes, this group will be switched to HFNC for another 30 minutes. The other group will start on HFNC and then switched to IF-CPAP. EAdi will be analyzed in the last 15 minutes of each 30 minutes period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in the number of apnea episodes (breathing pauses) on EAdi recorded with each modality.

    Time frame: During the 4-hour study period.

  2. Difference in episodes of clinically significant apnea with HFNC and IF-CPAP.

    Time frame: During the 4-hour study period.

  3. Indices of respiratory muscle effort (inspiratory and expiratory) will be calculated from Edi waveform.

    Time frame: During the 4-hour study period.

    These indices include the phasic Edi to the peak, mean inspiratory Edi, Edi-time product, post inspiratory activity and all neural timings.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Other

Collaborators

  • The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Delivered by High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on the Diaphragm Electrical Activity in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Mar 31, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 18, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.