Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05941286

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Alerts on Diabetes Management in the Hospital

Current continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide features that alert for current and impending adverse glycemic events.This trial aims to examine whether these glucose alerts provided added benefit on glycemic outcomes in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes who required intensive insulin therapy during hospitalization.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200233, China

About this study

Glycemic management for patients with diabetes during hospitalization is highly challenging, especially for those requiring intensive insulin therapy. For those patients, hypoglycemia is a common adverse event, which is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Bedside capillary point-of-care (POC) glucose monitoring is the standard of care to assess glycemic control in the hospital. However, POC glucose testing only provides glucose measurements at specific time points, leading to missed information important for glycemic control. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) measures interstitial glucose every 5 min, thus providing a more complete glycemic profile during a 24 h period compared with standard POC glucose testing.

The cloud-based real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) and management system was previously observed to be safe and effective in guiding intensive insulin therapy. Therefore, this CGM intergraded system holds promise for improving glucose control in patients with diabetes during hospitalization. However, it is currently unclear if alerts are the main reason for the better outcome in the RT-CGM groups, or rather the fact that sensor values are available in real-time. Moreover, the current system provided the feature of predictive threshold alerts that could alert before the onset of clinical hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Thus, this trial aims to examine whether these glucose alerts provided added benefit on glycemic outcomes in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes who required intensive insulin therapy during hospitalization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females ≥ 18 years.
  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glucose control requiring hospitalization, as determined by endocrinologists following clinical guidelines.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the clinical investigation plan.

Exclusion criteria

  • significant hyperglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis requiring continuous intravenous insulin infusion.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or have a plan of pregnancy at time of enrollment into the study.
  • Current users of real-time glucose monitoring sensors or flash-glucose monitoring.
  • Participants were unable to tolerate tape adhesive around sensor placement area, or with medically documented allergy towards the adhesive (glue) of plasters, or with serious skin diseases (e.g. psoriasis vulgaris, bacterial skin diseases) around sensor placement area.
  • Patients expected to require operation, admission to the ICU and MRI procedures during hospitalization.
  • Mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.

Treatment and study plan

CGM system with both glucose predictive alerts and threshold alerts on

Device

the cloud-based real-time continuous glucose monitoring and management system with both glucose predictive alerts and threshold alerts on

CGM system with only glucose threshold alerts on

Device

the cloud-based real-time continuous glucose monitoring and management system with only glucose threshold alerts on

CGM system with glucose alerts off

Device

the cloud-based real-time continuous glucose monitoring and management system with glucose predictive/threshold alerts off

Primary outcomes

  1. Time in range (3.9~10.0mmol/L, %)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Percentage of time within glucose level of 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) measured by CGM.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time above range (>10.0mmol/L, %)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Percentage of time above glucose level of 10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) measured by CGM.

  2. Time above range (>13.9mmol/L, %)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Percentage of time above glucose level of 13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL) measured by CGM.

  3. Time below range (<3.9mmol/L, %)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Percentage of time below glucose level of 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) measured by CGM.

  4. Time below range (<3.0mmol/L, %)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Percentage of time below glucose level of 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) measured by CGM.

  5. Time in range (3.9~7.8mmol/L, %)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Percentage of time within glucose level of 3.9-7.8 mmol/L (70-140 mg/dL) measured by CGM.

  6. Glycemia risk index (GRI)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Glycemia risk index (GRI) was calculated according to the following equation: GRI = (3.0×VLow) + (2.4×Low) + (1.6×VHigh) + (0.8×High).

  7. Mean sensor glucose (MSG)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Mean of daily continuous 24-h blood glucose.

  8. Coefficient of variation (CV)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Standard deviation divided by mean glucose level measured by CGM.

  9. Standard deviation (SD)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Standard deviation of blood glucose measurements during CGM.

Other outcomes

  1. Time taken to achieve target glucose (days)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Target glucose was defined as CGM-recorded TIR 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) more than 70%, with a maximum allowed time of 7 days.

  2. Length of hospital stay (days)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    The total length of hospital stay.

  3. Total daily insulin dose (units/kg/day)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Total daily insulin dose per kilogram of body weight per day.

  4. Total daily basal insulin dose (units/kg/day)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Total daily basal insulin dose per kilogram of body weight per day.

  5. Total prandial insulin dose (units/kg/day)

    Time frame: Through study completion (during hospitalization, 5-7 days)

    Total prandial basal insulin dose per kilogram of body weight per day.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai 6th People's Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Alerts on Diabetes Management in the Hospital: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Acronym: SIGNAL

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.