Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07580495

Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation

This study will evaluate whether adding a resorbable collagen membrane to an anorganic bone-collagen composite (ABCC) graft improves ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Ridge preservation is a procedure used to maintain the shape and volume of the jawbone following tooth removal, which is important for future dental implant placement.

Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ABCC alone or ABCC combined with a collagen membrane. Healing outcomes will be assessed after approximately 4 months using three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

The primary outcome is the change in horizontal ridge dimension (width). Secondary outcomes include vertical and contour changes in ridge dimensions, changes in soft tissue contour assessed with digital scans, postoperative healing and complications (such as wound dehiscence, swelling, or infection), and patient-reported outcomes, including pain and satisfaction. In a subset of participants, bone healing will also be evaluated using laboratory and imaging analyses of bone samples obtained at the time of implant placement. The study will additionally assess whether the treatment allows implant placement in the ideal position without the need for further bone grafting.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontics and Preventive Dentistry

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Andrea Ravida, DDS, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

7347309678

Debora R Dias, DDS, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

412-648-8595

Debora R Dias, DDS, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This study is a clinical trial that evaluates two different approaches to preserve the jawbone after tooth extraction in areas where part of the bone is already missing. Preserving the bone is important to support future dental implants.

Participants will be randomly assigned (like flipping a coin) to receive one of two treatments: a bone graft material alone, or the same bone graft combined with a protective collagen membrane placed over it.

Tooth extraction and follow-up care will be performed in the same manner for all participants. After approximately 4 months of healing, participants will return for dental implant placement.

During the healing period and at the time of implant placement, the research team will evaluate how well the bone and gums have healed. This will include three-dimensional CBCT scans, digital intraoral scans, and clinical measurements. In some participants, a small sample of bone will be collected at the time of implant placement to study bone healing.

The study will compare how effectively each treatment maintains the shape and volume of the jawbone, the quality of soft tissue healing, the risk of complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including comfort and satisfaction, and whether additional procedures are required prior to implant placement.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-80
  • Indicated for extraction of a single-rooted maxillary tooth
  • ≥ 50% buccal bone dehiscence confirmed by CBCT reconstructions
  • Presence of both adjacent teeth
  • No interproximal bone loss
  • ASA I-II health status
  • Ability to comply with required procedures, including attending required number of clinic visits

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with periodontitis adjacent to the area to be treated
  • History of allergic reactions to local anesthetics or bone graft material (self-reported);
  • Current heavy smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes/day) or those who quit smoking recently (self-reported; last 6 months);
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, liver or kidney failure (self-reported);
  • Presence of active infectious diseases of any kind;
  • History of chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the head or neck within the past 5 years (self-reported);
  • Severe hematologic disorders (risk for hemorrhage)(self-reported);
  • Assumption of corticosteroids, IV bisphosphonates or immunosuppressive drugs;
  • Any history of alcohol or drug abuse (self-reported);
  • Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant within 4 months of study enrollment (self-reported);

Treatment and study plan

Minimally Invasive tooth extraction

Procedure

Tooth extraction will be performed by a calibrated periodontist using a minimally invasive, flapless, atraumatic technique with periotomes and elevators to preserve socket architecture. Granulation tissue will be carefully removed without flap elevation.

Alveolar ridge preservation with ABCC

Device

The extraction socket will be grafted with ABCC (SigmaGraft®).

Resorbable collagen membrane (InterCollagen® Guide)

Device

A buccal pouch will be created on the buccal aspect, between the bone and the buccal flap, using tunneling instruments to accommodate a resorbable collagen membrane (InterCollagen® Guide; SigmaGraft®). The membrane will be positioned in the buccal tunnel to replace the missing buccal bone wall and provide graft containment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Horizontal dimensional changes (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Change in horizontal ridge width at 3 mm apical to the crest, measured on CBCT scans and expressed in percentage change.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Horizontal dimensional changes (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Change in horizontal ridge width at 1 mm apical to the crest, measured on CBCT scans and expressed in percentage change.

  2. Horizontal dimensional changes (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Change in horizontal ridge width at 5 mm apical to the crest, measured on CBCT scans and expressed in percentage change.

  3. Vertical dimensional changes (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Change in vertical ridge height at the midbuccal aspect, measured on CBCT scans and expressed in percentage change.

  4. Vertical dimensional changes (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Change in vertical ridge height at the mid palatal aspect, measured on CBCT scans and expressed in percentage change.

  5. Volumetric dimensional changes (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Change in the volume of the alveolar process (mm3), measured on CBCT scans in comparison to baseline and expressed in percentage change.

  6. Mid-buccal soft tissue contour change (mm)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Linear measurement (mm) of mid-buccal soft tissue profile change assessed by superimposition of stereolithography (STL) datasets. Adjacent teeth are used as reference for alignment. A positive value indicates soft tissue gain; a negative value indicates recession.

  7. Mid-buccal soft tissue volume change (%)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Volumetric change (mm³) in mid-buccal soft tissue contour calculated by superimposition of STL datasets and expressed in percentage. Color-coded deviation maps will illustrate areas of soft tissue collapse or gain.

  8. Interproximal papilla height change (mm)

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

    Linear measurement (mm) of interproximal papilla height change assessed by superimposition of STL datasets in comparison to baseline. A positive value indicates papilla gain; a negative value indicates papilla loss.

  9. Wound healing (Wound Healing Index)

    Time frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

    Wound healing quality assessed using the Wound Healing Index (WHI), a 3-point ordinal scale where 1 = uneventful healing (complete soft tissue coverage, no complications), 2 = normal healing with minor complications, and 3 = poor healing (dehiscence, exposure, or infection requiring intervention). Lower scores indicate better healing.

  10. Incidence of postoperative complications (Percentage)

    Time frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 4 months

    Proportion of participants experiencing at least one postoperative complication (edema, erythema, suppuration, graft exposure, or wound dehiscence) at any follow-up visit. Complications will be recorded by a blinded clinical examiner at each scheduled visit.

  11. Postoperative pain

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, 1 week

    Numeric scale (0-10) for pain after the extraction and ridge preservation procedure.

  12. Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14)

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 months

    Oral health-related quality of life assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile - 14 (OHIP-14), a validated 14-item questionnaire.

  13. Feasibility of prosthetically ideal implant placement without additional augmentation

    Time frame: 4 months

    Ability to place the implant in a prosthetically ideal three-dimensional position at reentry without the need for additional hard-tissue augmentation.

  14. Histological Outcomes

    Time frame: 4 months

    In a subset of patients, a bone core biopsy will be obtained. Percent area of new bone, residual graft, and marrow spaces assessed by histomorphometric analysis of bone core biopsies obtained at the time of implant placement.

  15. Patient satisfaction (VAS)

    Time frame: 4 months

    Visual analogue scale (0-100) of patient satisfaction with the appearance of the soft tissues

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Carla Sanchez, MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

4126241179

Debora R Dias, DDS, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

4126488595

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Debora Dias

Other

Collaborators

  • SigmaGraft Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation for Delayed Implant Placement in Sites With Absent Buccal Bone Wall: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 12, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.