Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00292825

Effect of Closed Loop Pacemaker Treatment on Recurrent Vasovagal Syncope

The main purpose is to prevent syncope in patients with recurrent syncopal episodes caused by malignant vasovagal faints and bradycardia. Patients are treated by a special pacemaker (closed loop stimulation [CLS]) which can potentially identify an incipient attack and prevent syncope by pacing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The treatment of patients with recurrent syncope of vasovagal origin, not precipitated by usual vasovagal factors, and not associated with structural heart disease, is unsolved. The limitations of the conducted 5 pacemaker studies are a significant placebo effect of pacemaker treatment, underpowering and lack of double blinding. The pacemaker intervention has been accelerated dual chamber pacing at the time of bradycardia, which may be too late. However, a pooling of all data indicate a beneficial effect of pacing.

Vasodilatation is an obligate element of all vasovagal syncopal episodes and in many also an early sign associated with the hyperkinetic empty left ventricle which triggers the reflex wave. The principle in closed loop stimulation (CLS) is a continuous surveillance of the impedance in the right ventricle which correlates highly with myocardial contractility. When contractility is increased significantly atrial pacing with prolonged AV delay is commenced. This principle has been used in chronotropic incompetent patients and in one small study of patients with vasovagal syncope with a positive outcome. The hypothesis is that the CLS will potentially identify an incipient vasovagal attack and be able to prevent the drop in cardiac output and bradycardia by early accelerated pacing.

Patients will be treated 12 months with active pacing (CLS) and then crossed over to 12 months with passive pacing (VVI, 30 bpm).

The study will be double blinded, only a technician will know the status of the pacemaker.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A clinical problem with vasovagal syncope which motivates considerations concerning pacemaker treatment.
  • A positive tilt-table test.
  • Exclusion of other causes for syncope by a complete diagnostic work-up allowing only minor cardiac abnormalities
  • Syncope for >= 2 years.
  • Number of syncopal episodes >= 3
  • At least 1 instance of syncope within the last 6 months.
  • A positive tilt-table test which reproduces the clinical syncope and is associated with a clearly abnormal haemodynamic response:
  • Vasovagal Syncope International Study (VASIS) type 1 with bradycardia < 40 bpm, or
  • VASIS type 2A, or
  • VASIS type 2B
  • Stable clinical condition
  • Able to accept and follow the protocol and give written consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Conventional indication for pacemaker (i.e. atrioventricular [AV] block)
  • Indication for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (i.e. left bundle branch block [LBBB])
  • Documented atrial fibrillation or flutter
  • Epilepsy
  • Congestive heart failure
  • History of myocardial infarction (MI) or angina pectoris
  • Serious chronic disease, life expectancy < 3 years.
  • Age < 25 years
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Participating in other investigation

Treatment and study plan

Pacemaker treatment, pacemaker programmed as active = CLS

Device

Pacemaker treatment with closed loop function(CLS)

Pacemaker, programmed as passive = VVI 30 beats per minute (bpm)

Device

pacemaker treatment as VVI 30 bpm

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of syncope, active (CLS pacing) versus passive (VVI=30) pacing period

    Time frame: 12 months + 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of syncopal and presyncopal episodes, active versus passive pacing period

    Time frame: 12 months+12 months

  2. Quality of life, active versus passive pacing period

    Time frame: 12 months+12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Other

Collaborators

  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Biotronik SE & Co. KG

Registry information

Official study title

SCANdinavian Vasovagal SYNCope Pacemaker Investigation (SCANSYNC)

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Feb 16, 2006
Registry last updated
Apr 1, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.